Full text: ISPRS Workshop on Laser Scanning 2013

tography by in- 
e, as the nature 
onsidered tem- 
:loud/image. If 
elonged to the 
hanges in sub- 
manent objects 
y 
>. 
  
ed 
he urban scene 
[ION 
ent passages of 
lifferent times) 
ions and com- 
point cloud is 
responding 3D 
nerated in sub- 
| the associated 
ın environment 
cater for these 
d (Urban Data 
or comparison 
rate graph the- 
3D point cloud 
/idence grid as 
rid occupies a 
| on certain at- 
hese attributes 
rmal along X, 
nsity and mean 
'spectively and 
lized values of 
RÀ + WnpNp 
np 
(1) 
0.5 are Occu- 
25 and ug. — 
Wnp = 0.0625 
se weights are 
magnitude and 
sity and color) 
nment and also 
cy grid method 
grids are con- 
(np — 1)) and 
used to formu- 
associated un- 
rocess in each 
uitable for ana- 
3.2 Similarity Map Construction 
In order to obtain a similarity map in each passage, the 3D evid- 
ence grid in successive passages is compared. Instead of finding 
the overall graph/grid similarity, we are more interested in meas- 
uring the similarity of each cell as this indicates exactly which 
part of the 3D cartography has changed. Currently, many dis- 
tances have been developed to compare two objects (in this case 
cell) according to the type of attributes, such as x? or Mahalan- 
obis. However, when working with real values, the most widely 
used (and simplest) metric is Minkowski measure dp: 
k 1 
dp(x,y) = [> wile: -w] ? with p » 0 Q) 
i=1 
In this measure, x; and y; are the values of the i^ attribute de- 
scribing the individuals x and y. W; is the numerical weight cor- 
related with this attribute. k is the total number of attributes. In 
order to transform Minkowski distance (2) into a similarity meas- 
ure sp a value D; is introduced, that corresponds to the difference 
between the upper and the lower bounds of the range of the i 
attribute: 
k p 
wey = [2-7 
iz] T 
1 
|? withp > 0 3) 
This similarity function may provide a measure indicating the 
amount of changes occurring in a 3D grid cell in subsequent pas- 
sages but it remains silent on the type of change taking place. 
Now this information could be useful when deciding how to handle 
these changes in the 3D cartography. Thus, in order to get more 
insight into the type of changes we incorporate the notion of dis- 
tance between individuals or objects studied in Cognitive Sci- 
ences. For this purpose, we use the method proposed by Tversky 
(Tversky, 1977) to evaluate the degree of similarity S; , between 
two individuals x and y respectively, described by a set of attrib- 
utes A and B, by combining the four terms AUB, ANB, A—B 
and B — A into the formula: 
f(An B) 
f(AU B) t af(A — B) * Bf(B — A) 
As we want to compare a pair of individuals (in this case, cells 
in successive passages) described by a set of numerical attributes, 
we combine the definitions proposed by Tversky and Minkowski. 
In these measures, we use Tversky's model to compare the two 
sets of attributes describing the individuals; the function f of this 
model is the Minkowski's formula as rewritten in (3). The para- 
meter p of this formula equals 1 since in Tversky's model the 
function f corresponds to a linear combination of the features. 
Now, depending upon the way the parameters o and Ó are in- 
stantiated, different kinds of cognitive models of similarity can 
be expressed. By instantiating à. = 3 = 0 we obtain the sym- 
metric similarity measure Sym while by instantiating a = 0 and 
B = —1 we obtain the asymmetric similarity measure ASym. 
Now we use these values to fill up similarity map S 55 as shown 
in Fig. 2. The values of ASym allow to evaluate the degree of 
inclusion between the first cell (reference) into the second cell 
(target). Hence, with the attributes (along with their correspond- 
ing weights) assigned to these cells (discussed in § 3.1), the value 
of ASym can be used to assume the type of changes occurring 
in the 3D grid cell as summarized in Tab. 1 where x and y are 
the same 3D grid cell in different passages. These values of Sym 
and ASyms not only help in ascertaining the type of changes oc- 
curring but also the most suitable action required to handle that 
particular 3D grid cell. Condition 1 is automatically handled in 
the incremental updating phase where as for condition 2 and 3, 
Automatic Reset function is called into action. 
This similarity map Smap is updated in each passage and only 
the different cells (with Sym < Similaritythreshold) along with 
their associated uncertainty values are kept in the map whereas 
the remaining cells considered as identical cells (with high level 
  
(4) 
Sz.,y = 
of similarity) are deleted from the map. Hence, this not only re- 
duces the size of the map progressively in subsequent passages, 
but also avoids possible storage memory issues for large point 
clouds in case of large mapping areas (see § 5, Fig. 8, for more 
details). 
  
(c) 
Figure 2: Formulation of 3D evidence grids and similarity map. 
(a) & (b) show the 3D point clouds (P(n,) and P(n, — 1)) 
mapped onto an evidence grid of cell size L? respectively. In 
(c), the similarity map obtained from the two evidence grids. 
  
[ET Condition | Possible assumption ] 
I | ASym;,, < ASymy,z Addition of structure 
(could be new construction or earlier 
misclassified objects) 
  
  
  
  
2 ASyms,y > ASymy,z Removal of structure 
(could be demolition) 
3 | A5ymz,y = ASymy = Modification of structure 
  
  
  
  
(depending on the value of Sym) 
  
Table 1: Type of changes 
3.3 Associated Uncertainty 
Let the cell scores of a particular cell j in n number of passages: 
Cl Css 2 C2, Dean fid sequence of random variables, 
then the n*" sample variance s,” is given as: 
j ^j y? 
x S d (Cs, PA Ct.) 
;2 
sù = 
n—1 
then, adding and subtracting el 
E 1 n j hj xy ED NS 
Sn = n= j. S (Ce CE i + C nci E. cl) | 
pun 
Expanding and solving this to get 
;2 1 2 =; e. 
M mue-38 0-208, - 05» 
n—1 
; Le T RID 
* 2 >. (C$, = er XC | = C$, )] * (C$. E C$.) | 
k=1 
Using the standard mean (77; Gi. — (n—- 06i the 
sum-term simplifies to 0: 
2 = a ; TU 
[n - 255, 9 ( - 065, = CF, + (Ch, - 05, Y] 
  
  
sj 2 = 
" 0-1 
Further simplification yields 
$ 6 2 
82 = (222), Gi Sy 
" (n= 1) 751 n 
The uncertainty associated with each cell in the map u? is hence 
estimated and updated in each passage (n > 1) using the follow- 
ing relations: 
(n ET 2) (Cs, = e " 1 (5) 
(n — 1) n 
  
) ub y + 
uh = [( 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.