Full text: Resource and environmental monitoring

  
In the eco-friendly economic development 
perspective, the ecological equilibrium is taken as 
norm and the focus is mainly on building up a 
pattern and a rate of resource use which the 
environment can sustain indefinitely (Wilkinson, 
1973). Lastly, the social perspective lays more 
emphasis on continued welfare of the society. The 
role of economic - demographic interrelationship is 
either explicitly or implicitly referred to. 
4 SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS 
Sustainability is a concept and can not be 
measured directly. Appropriate indicators must, 
therefore, be selected, tested, and validated to 
determine levels and duration of sustainable land 
management. Sustainability indicators are needed 
to monitor progress and to assess the effectiveness 
and impact of policies on natural resources 
development. An ideal indicator should be 
unbiased, sensitive to changes, predictive, 
referenced to threshold values, data transformable, 
integrative and easy to collect and communicate 
(Liverman et al. 1988). One such indicator is land 
quality indicator which includes nutrient balance, 
yield trend and yield gaps, land use (agrodiversity) 
and land cover (Dumanski, 1997). 
The sustainability coefficient (Cs) which is dynamic 
and is problem or mission-oriented is another 
indicator of sustainability. There are three basic 
systems, natural system, man-made system and 
interface system. One such proposed coefficient 
for a man-made system may be as follows (Lal, 
1991): 
Cs = f (0i,0d, Om)t 
Where Oi =Output per that unit input that 
maximizes the per capita productivity or profit 
Od = Output per unit decline in the most limiting or 
non-renewable resource 
Om = Minimum assured output 
t = time 
The exact nature of the function may be site- 
specific and will need input from local empirical 
research data. For a natural system the 
sustainability coefficient (Cs), mentioned above, 
could be modified to account for the role of human 
being and could be written as (Rao and 
Chandrasekhar, 1996) 
Cs =f (0i,0d,Om,HDI)t 
Where HDI=Human development index. 
Further, in case of a interface system also the HDI 
becomes very important modulating factor for 
deriving sustainability indices. Conceptually, it can 
be formulated as (Rao and Chandrasekhar, 1996) 
Cs 7 f (Oi, Od,Om)t. HDI 
For man-made system dominated by agricultural 
farming, the model conceptualizes a positive feed 
back mechanism between Q1 and Q2 which could 
be expressed in a simple form as (Rao et al. 1995). 
Q1-Q2 > 0 Unsustainable development 
Q1-Q2 = 0 Sustainable development 
Q1-Q2 < 0 Virgin eco-systems (Protected bio- 
reserves) 
Where Q1 = Production in energy units and - 
includes the emission of CO2, transport of moisture 
through evapo-transpiration and transport of 
nutrients 
Q2 = Consumption in terms of energy units CO2, 
H20 and nutrients from the atmosphere or external 
sources. 
A fragile balance between production processes 
(Q1 energy units) and consumption practices (Q2 
energy units) ensures compatibility between 
supportive and assimilative capacity of a region. 
5. ROLE OF REMOTE SENSING AND GIS 
The information on nature, extent, spatial 
distribution, and potential and limitations of natural 
resources is a pre-requisite for planning the 
strategy for sustainable development. In addition, 
socio-economic and meteorological, and other 
related ancillary information is also required while 
recommending locale-specific prescriptions for 
taking up curative or preventive measures. By 
virtue of synoptic view of a fairly large area at 
regular interval, spaceborne multispectral data have 
been used at operational level for generating base 
line information on mineral resources, soils, ground 
water and surface water, land use/land cover, 
forests, etc. at scales ranging for regional to micro 
level i.e. 1:250,000 to 1:12,500 scale and 
monitoring the changes, if any, over a period of 
time. Beginning with the Landsat-MSS data with a 
60X80m spatial resolution and four spectral bands 
spanning from green to near infrared in early 
seventies, the natural resources scientists had 
access to Landsat-TM data with a 30m spatial 
resolution and seven spectral bands spread over 
between blue and thermal infrared ‘region of the 
electromagnetic spectrum in early eighties which 
helped further refinement and generation of 
thematic information at further larger scale. 
Further, high spatial resolution HRV-MLA and PLA 
data with 20m and 10m spatial resolution, 
158 International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998 
resp 
half 
gent 
The 
Indi: 
(LIS 
with 
late 
devi 
in th 
in D 
sen: 
(DV 
spe: 
swa 
(ii) | 
with 
nea 
infre 
(iil) 
resc 
pro 
ass 
140 
esti 
dat: 
Met 
adv 
fron 
LIS 
Suc 
soil 
unit 
the 
are 
und 
avo 
Fur 
esp 
has 
sat 
The 
Ser 
anc 
che 
reg 
For 
cor
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.