Full text: Resource and environmental monitoring

  
necessity of achieving mean geometric accuracies below 
the size of half.a pixel, if pixelwise comparison is 
performed. This accuracy .can be obtained by automated 
image matching and co-registration of the geocoded 
image data sets with acceptable efficiency under.certain 
conditions. Investigations on co-registration methóds are 
currently carried out at the Institute of Digital. Image 
Processing of Joanneum Research in order to improve 
the performance of the monitoring system. 
4.2 Topographic Normalisation 
Topography does not only affect the geometric properties 
of an image but also has a significant impact on the 
illumination and the reflection of the scanned area 
(McCormick et al, 1995; Schardt, 1987 and 1990; 
Kenneweg et al., 1996). This effect is caused by the local 
variations of view and illumination angles due ‘to the 
terrain and thus is particularly critical for applications in 
alpine regions. Therefore, identical forest-cover might be 
represented by totally different intensity values depending 
on its orientation and on the position of the sun at the 
time of data acquisition. 
To overcome this problem, several radiometric correction 
procedures are described in literature. Besides empirical 
approaches which do not take into account the physical 
behaviour of image elements, earlier correction methods 
were based on the lambertian assumption, i.e. the 
satellite images are normalised according to the cosine of 
the effective illumination angle (Smith et al. 1980). 
However, most objects on the earth's surface show non- 
lambertian reflectance characteristics (Meyer et al., 1993; 
Schardt, 1990; Schardt and Schmitt, 1996). As it could be 
shown by investigations of Civco (1991) and Colby (1991) 
and by the present study the cosine correction has to be 
extended by introducing parameters, which simulate the 
non-lambertian behaviour of the surface. The estimation 
of these parameters is generally based on a linear 
regression between the radiometrically distorted bands 
and an incidence angle map, derived from the digital 
elevation model. From the experiences of this study the 
Minnaert correction model is best suited for topographical 
corrections. 
4.3 Image Calibration - Atmospheric Correction 
Variations in atmospheric conditions have a serious 
influence on the imagery from earth observing satellites, 
especially in the 400 to 2500 nm region of the spectrum 
(Haefner, 1992). The atmosphere influences the radiation 
reaching a sensor in the following ways (Richter, 1990): 
e the atmosphere contributes its own part in reflected 
radiation 
e it absorbs parts of the incident as well as the reflected 
radiation 
e it scatters reflected radiation in the vicinity around 
object which leads to a reduction of the image 
contrasts (adjacency effects). This is to be expected 
especially with high resolution satellite sensors 
The reflectance changes to be detected in the alpine 
forests are small compared with the differences between 
absolute calibrated images. For instance, an investigation 
of Schardt et al., 1995 demonstrates that drastic changes 
in canopy density of 20% only leads to insignificant 
signature differences of 3 to 4 digital numbers in the 
infrared bands TM 4 and 5 and about 1 to 2 digital 
numbers in the green and red spectral range represented 
by band TM 2 and 3. From these results it can be 
deduced that image calibration is a critical issue in 
monitoring applications and has to be carried out very 
precisely. 
In order to correct these errors image calibration was 
performed relatively by using statistical regression of the 
image data sets. For estimating the regression 
parameters only'areas have to be used which are covered 
by forest at all image acquisition dates. This procedure 
ensures that only forest areas (pixels) will be considered 
which have not drastically changed. Thus, no clear cuts 
and strongly damaged areas which are characterised by 
very low canopy densities were included. The forested 
areas of the multitemporal images (forest masks) to be 
used for monitoring were generated by applying threshold 
values for each acquisition date (see chapter 4.4). Areas 
which are forested at all acquisition dates are resulting 
from the overlay of the multitemporal forest masks (AND- 
Operator). 
Olsson (1993, 1995) states, for example that errors in the 
geometry between the multitemporal data sets will result 
in calibration functions that underestimate light areas. AS 
it could be shown by Olsson (1993, 1995) and this study, 
too, (see chapter 4.5) this effect is far more critical in 
heterogeneous areas such as forests than it is the case 
for intensively used agricultural areas. In order to reduce 
geometrical superposition errors the calculation of the 
regression parameters is based on image data sets which 
are aggregated by a 10 by 10 pixel window. The 
aggregation is carried out by calculating the mean values 
for each of the windows. This regression parameters are 
then applied to the original topographical normalised 
images. This procedure is resulting in relatively calibrated 
images which are characterised by a similar signature 
behaviour. 
Besides of relative calibration also absolute calibration 
methods exist and will be tested within the objective 
studies. For the intended tests the 6S code which has 
been shown to be powerful in the past will be applied to 
the multitemporal Landsat and SPOT data (Sandmeier, 
1997; Vermote et al., 1994). This calibration method takes 
into account Rayleigh and aerosol scattering, as well as 
gas absorption due to water, carbon dioxide, ozone, 
oxygen, methane, nitrous oxide and carbon monoxide 
between 0.25 and 4.0 um in a spectral resolution of 2.5 
nm. The input parameters for 6S can be chosen from 
proposed standard conditions, or specified by the user. 
The monitoring system to be established is designed in 
such a way that it is open to use both calibration methods, 
alternatively. This is due to the fact that the subsequent 
268 International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998 
proces: 
be ba: 
images 
image 
system 
4.4 Cla 
Collect 
For th 
informe 
indispe 
necess 
image ! 
informe 
photog 
sufficie 
be inve 
well sui 
the acti 
lassifi 
As a fir 
are cr 
acquisi! 
classific 
mask) 
masks. 
areas 
conside 
one of 
include 
procedi 
areas v 
e COV 
e are: 
at a 
e and 
ope 
Basical 
using : 
signatu 
severe 
vegetat 
Therefc 
is nece 
and nor 
As the 
classific 
pixel-wi 
For the 
SPOT-t 
categor 
e fore: 
e fore: 
* age
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.