Full text: Resource and environmental monitoring

  
  
  
  
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of 
U.K. Natural Environment Research Council through re- 
search grant number GR3/10186. The digital map data 
used in this study are reproduced from the Ordnance 
Survey 1:1250 scale Land-Line.93+ with the permission 
of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 
Crown Copyright. We are grateful to Peter Blamire and 
Thomas Bauer (Department of Geography, University of 
Wales Swansea, UK) for their assistance in processing 
these data. 
REFERENCES 
Aplin, P., Atkinson, P.M., and Curren, P.J., 1997. Fine 
spatial resolution satellite sensors for the next decade. 
International Journal of Remote Sensing, In Press. 
Barnsley, M.J., and Barr, S.L., 1993. Mapping urban 
areas using high spatial resolution remotely-sensed im- 
ages: 1. data pre-processing. Proc. NERC Symposium 
on Airborne Remote Sensing, University of Dundee, 20- 
21 December 1993, 1-13. 
Barnsley, M.J., and Barr, S.L., 1996. Inferring urban 
land-use from satellite sensor images using kernel-based 
spatial re-classification. Photogrammetric Engineering 
and Remote Sensing, 62(8), 949-958. 
Barnsley, M.J., Barr, S.L., 1997. A graph-based, struc- 
tural pattern recognition system to infer urban land-use 
from fine spatial resolution land-cover data. Computers, 
Environment and Urban Systems, 21(3/4), 209-225. 
Barr, S.L., 1992. Object based re-classification of high 
resolution digital imagery for urban land-use monitoring. 
In /nt Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 
Commission VII, Washington D.C., 2-14 August 1992, 
969—96 7. 
Barr, S.L., and Barnsley, M.J., 1997. A region-based, 
graph-theoretic data model for the inference of second- 
order information from remotely-sensed images. Inter- 
national Journal of Geographical Information Science, 
11(6), 555-576. 
Barr, S.L., Barnsley, S.L., 1998. A syntactic pattern- 
recognition paradigm for the derivation of second-order 
thematic information from remotely-sensed images. In 
Atkinson, P., and Tate, N., (editors), Advances in Re- 
mote Sensing and GIS Analysis, John Wiley and Sons 
(Chichester), In Press. 
Blamire, P., and Barnsley, M.J., 1995. Information 
extraction from very high spatial resolution images of 
urban areas. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference 
of the Remote Sensing Society (Nottingham: Remote 
Sensing Society), pp. 1212-1220. 
Forster, B.C., 1985. An examination of some problems 
and solutions in monitoring urban areas from satellite 
platforms, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6, 
139-151. 
Freeman, J., 1975. The modeling of spatial relations. 
Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 4, 156-171. 
Fritz, L.W., 1996. The era of commercial earth obser- 
vation satellites, Photogrammetric Engineering and Re- 
mote Sensing, 62, 39-45. 
Gastellu-Etchegorry, J.P., 1990. An assessment of SPOT 
XS and Landsat MSS data for digital classification of 
near-urban land cover, International Journal of Remote 
Sensing, 11, 225-235. 
Gonzalez, R.C., and Woods, R.E., 1993. Digital Image 
Processing (New York: Addison- Wesley). 
Gurney, C.M., and Townshend, J.R.G., 1983. The use 
of contextual information in the classification of remotely 
sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote 
Sensing, 49, 55-64. 
Johnsson, K., 1994. Segment-based land-use classifica- 
tion from spot satellite data. Photogrammetric Engin- 
eering and Remote Sensing, 60(1), 47-53. 
Martin, L.R.G., Howarth, P.J., and Holder, G., 1988. 
Multispectral classification of land use at the rural-urban 
fringe using SPOT data, Canadian Journal of Remote 
Sensing, 14, 72-79. 
Moller-Jensen, L., 1990. Knowledge-based classification 
of an urban area using texture and context information 
in Landsat- TM imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering 
and Remote Sensing, 56(6), 899-904. 
Ridley, H.M., Atkinson, P.M., Aplin, P., Muller, J.P., 
and Dowman, [., 1997. Evaluating the potential of forth- 
coming commercial U.S. high-resolution satellite sensor 
imagery at the ordnance survey. Photogrammetric En- 
gineering and Remote Sensing, 63(8), 997-1005. 
322 Intemational Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998 
  
KEY 
ABST 
The di 
of new 
not or 
be ren 
it in a 
The r 
new n 
the E 
satelli! 
resolu 
adequ. 
of inf 
To ful 
the us 
The p 
coveri 
was Ir 
used, 
the e» 
pixels 
preprc 
For at 
availa 
testing 
categc 
The tl 
model 
imple 
and in
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.