d from
s were
high,
uctivity
e from
under
for the
PG. In
ie most
to the
1e most
nd use
he total
most of
je most
' high
system.
luctivity
se class
an land
ua, U.S.
epresent
lv, these
se the
to high
as found
ductivity
> gap in
M and
se class
em was
ould be
' current
These
tterns in
can also
ns from
ng and
National
ffice of
NAG 5-
6. LITERATURE CITED
Bliss. N.B.. and W.U. Revbold. 1989. Small-scale
digital soil maps for interpreting natural resources.
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 44. pp. 30-34.
Elvidge. C.D.. K.E. Baugh. E.A. Kihn. H.W. Kroehl.
and E.R. Davis. 1997. Mapping city lights with
nighttime data from the DMSP Operational Linescan
System. Photogrammetric. Engineering & Remote
Sensing, 63 (6). pp. 727-734.
Imhoff. M.L.. W.T. Lawrence. C.D. Elvidge. T. Paul.
E. Levine. M.V. Privalsky. and V. Brown. 1996. Using
nighttime DMSP/OLS images of city lights for
esumating the impact of urban land use on soil
resources in the U.S. Remote Sensing of Environment,
59. pp. 105-117.
Liu. R.. and P.J. Craul. 1991. A GIS based soil
capability classification for agriculture in Yuisu county.
China. p. 99-106. In: Annual Convention of the
ACSM-ASPRS. Vol. 4. Technical papers. ACSM-
ASPRS. Bethesda. MD.
Nizcyimana. E.. and G.W. Petersen. 1998. Land usc
planning and environmental impact assessments using
GIS. In: Environmental Modeling with GIS and
Remote Sensing, Kluwer Academic Press, (in press).
Sinclair. H.R.. W.J. Waltman, S.W. Waltman. H.P.
Terstra. and D. Reed-Margctan. 1996. Soil ratings for
plant growth. A rclative index of inhcrent soil quality.
NRCS-NSSL and lowa State Univ.. Ames. IA. | map.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual.
USDA Agricultural Handbook 18. U.S. Government
Printing Officc. Washington. DC.
Vogelmann. J.E.. Sohl. T.. and Howard. S.M.. 1998.
Regional characterization of land cover using multiple
sources of data. Photogrammetric Engincering &
Remote Sensing, 64(1). pp. 45-57.
Intemational Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998
463