e. But, 
)ecause 
ness by 
ces the 
   
NU 
   
  
   
  
   
  
  
  
      
  
  
  
< 
z 
o. Huis, Areas without deterioration = 
SSS  Moderately-deteriorated areas A se 
o ELO Seriously-deteriorated areas z x 
w 7 - A 
E 
od -E 
r SS NN S 
mut Neh 
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 
(m) 
Fig-10 Relationship between elevation and the degree of deterioration 
  
  
Areas without deterioration 
Nw Moderately-deteriorated areas 
dk UN 
  
  
  
3 Seriously-deteriorated areas 
  
  
   
   
  
   
       
  
Od: 
      
      
     
   
7 
2^ 
of A 
Wh 
se 
rds 
15 20 25 30 & 
TN 
   
    
        
        
        
      
        
   
10 
- 
ZA 
Gl 
4 
e 
4 
A 
77 
e 
A 
LE. 
5 
e 
FS S. 
KAS 
2) 
ROSE Yo 
NEE 
EDEN ES 
N NS 
AM Cu re 
NN 
PA) 
ANN 
XA 
2 AC 
VA 
A DA GE 
GE ESS 
d fe y 
2 
AAT US 
7 
u 
7, 
^ 
7 
y 
2477 
GE 
/ 
v 
  
A 
VIE 
GE 
AA 
ws 
o 
0 
    
   
  
  
- 
ed 
- 
Ta 
Fig-11 Relationship between slope gradient and the degree of deterioration 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
(%) 
9 4 E: SEE 
© NN 
eo. 
< 
© —- 
Q 
o Areas without Moderately- 
deterioration deteriorated areas deteriorated areas 
Fig-12 Relationship between slope aspects and the degree of 
deterioration 
Intemational Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998 
717