, CA, 9-11 Nov. 1999
he observed stand height. The
be applied on a pixel-by-pixel
' can be applied on a patch-by-
heir spatial structure. Finally,
en image spectral qualities and
tions relating those indices to
can be applied to the images,
nsive maps of, for instance,
imple of one such image is
LUSION
that it is feasible to use forest
the relationships between lidar
ind elements of forest structure
his type of application is likely
g such relationships and their
plement datasets of coincident
e and lidar measurements.
ata is likely to be one important
data from that system become
" @ Model
+ Valid
= .827 + .975 * Predicted
R/2 = .71 (Model)
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 3W14, La Jolla, CA, 9-11 Nov. 1999
Biomass Mgha'!
[1
100
Z00
E
400
AU
aa
Fig. 4. Predicted biomass
4. REFERENCES
Bouman, C. and M. Shapiro, 1994. A multiscale model for
bayesian image segmentation. [EEE Transactions on Image
Processing, 3(2):162-177.
Cohen, W. B. T. A. Spies, and G. A. Bradshaw, 1990.
Semivariograms of digital imagery for analysis of conifer
canopy structure. Rem. Sensing of Environ., 34: 167-178.
Crist, E. P., and R. C. Cicone, 1984. A physically-based
transformation of thematic mapper data--The TM tasseled cap.
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-22:
256-263.
Dubayah, R., J. B. Blair, J. L. Bufton, D. B. Clark, J. JaJa, R.
Knox, S. B. Luthcke, S. Prince, and J. Weishampel, 1997. The
Vegetation Canopy Lidar mission, proceedings, land satellite
information in the next decade II: sources and applications. Am.
Soc. for Photogramm. and Remote Sens., Bethesda, MD, 100-
112.
Harding, D.J., J. B. Blair, E. Rodriguez, and T. Michel, 1995.
Airborne laser altimetry and interferometric SAR measurements
of canopy structure and sub-canopy topography in the Pacific
Northwest. Proc. Second Topical Symposium on Combined
Optical - Microwave Earth and Atmosphere Sensing (CO-
MEAS'95), 22-24.
Lefsky, M.A., 1997. Application of lidar remote sensing to the
estimation of forest canopy and stand structure. Ph.D. thesis,
Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville,
VA.
Lefsky, M.A., D. J. Harding, W. B. Cohen, G. G. Parker, and H.
H. Shugart, 1999a. Lidar remote sensing of forest basal area and
biomass: application and theory. Rem. Sensing of Environ.,
67:83-98.
Lefsky, M., W. Cohen, S. Acker, G. Parker, T. Spies, and D.
Harding, 1999b. Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties
and canopy structure of forests of Douglas-fir and western
hemlock. Rem. Sensing of Environ., 70(3):339-361.
Li, X. S., Strahler, A. H., 1985. Geometric-optical bidirectional
reflectance modeling of a conifer forest canopy. /EEE
Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-24: 906-
919.
Means, J. E., H. A. Hansen, G.J.Koerper, P. B. Alaback, and M.
W. Klopsch, 1994. Software for computing plant biomass-
BIOPAK users guide. PNW Research Station, USDA F.S.,
Portland, Oregon.
Moeur, M. and A. R. Stage, 1995. Most similar neighbor: an
improved sampling inference procedure for natural resource
planning. Forest Science, 41:337-359.
Nelson , R., 1997. Modeling forest canopy heights: the effects
of canopy shape. Rem. Sensing of Environ., 60:327-334.
Sun, G. and K.J. Ranson, 1995. A three-dimensional radar
backscatter model of forest canopies. IEEE Transactions on
Geosciences and Remote Sensing, GE-33(2):372-382.
Van Pelt, R. and M.P. North, 1996. Analyzing canopy structure
in Pacific Northwest Old-growth forests with a stand-scale
crown model. Northwest Science, 70:Special Issue 15-30.