Full text: Mapping surface structure and topography by airborne and spaceborne lasers

    
  
   
    
    
   
     
   
    
  
9-11 Nov. 1999 
5 
the variables that will 
instrument base over the 
ect forward based on the 
rument base from 1998- 
the instrument base from 
ries by June 2000, was 
9-2000 is considered, the 
6 presents a forward 
nt base based on these 
  
  
  
35%" 
tal Year Total 
9 9 29 
8 18 38 
2 a... 58 
3 20 78 
1 27 105 
14 37 142 
43 50 192 
79 67 259 
  
  
| Instrument Base 
> world market for remote 
Data and GIS Software 
nsulting Report, 1999) 
rowth rate through 2005 
The survey and mapping 
icant growth due to the 
wth in GIS markets, both 
f the global economy. It 
1al growth of 10% in the 
nents will be required just 
am segments of the value 
to assume that the growth 
eventually plateau as the 
ituration. To account for 
on the projected increase. 
mparison to the installed 
rain the growth curves. 
e of Aerial Cameras 
e laser altimetry can be 
ywth and breakdown of 
the future growth of the 
open to interpretation. In 
se that may eventually be 
ry sensors, it is useful to 
base of instruments. The 
ied sector of the remote 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 3W14, La Jolla, CA, 9-11 Nov. 1999 
sensing industry that offers one possible reference frame for 
estimating the final base of laser sensors. Aerial film cameras 
are a very mature technology that has been available as a 
commercial product for nearly 80 years. Industry estimates of 
the total number of aerial cameras built since 1920 for peaceful 
commercial purposes are ~ 7,000 with a current worldwide base 
of ~2000 (Fricker, 1999). Annual deliveries of new cameras are 
estimated at 25-35 each year. (Walker, 1999). There are many 
operational similarities that support this comparison between 
aerial photogrammetry firms and survey companies offering 
airborne laser services. Historically, many of the early adopters 
of commercial laser altimetry were, and continue to be, aerial 
survey companies looking to add elevation capture to their 
imaging services. The operational requirements for air photo 
and laser surveys - access to survey aircraft, trained and 
experienced aerial survey crews and ground crews, support 
infrastructure, business focus and skill sets are very 
comparable. 
To date the barriers to entry for most commercial air survey 
firms have been the high capital costs of the laser sensors and 
limited experience and exposure to laser technology. If the 
barriers to entry for deploying laser altimetry within a survey 
business were completely removed or significantly reduced, it 
can be argued that 100% of aerial film camera operators would 
incorporate laser altimetry in to their operations. The addition 
of simultaneous elevation data capture to their normal imaging 
operations would significantly increase the value of their data 
end products in addition to opening new niche markets for their 
services. However, for the purposes of this paper, a more 
conservative estimate of 10% will be used to estimate the 
percentage of the aerial camera owners that may eventually 
acquire laser altimetry instruments. The 10% estimate is 
assumed to be conservative enough to allow for continued 
barriers to entry slowing adoption of the technology as well as 
for the potential introduction of competing technology that may 
reduce the operational advantages of laser altimetry. A 10% 
overlap between the aerial camera market and laser altimetry 
implies a total instrument base of ~200 sensor worldwide. This 
is significantly more than the currently installed base of ~40 
instruments, even projecting through 2000 to an installed base 
of 60. A deficit of ~160 instruments represents a significant 
challenge to the industry given the estimated production 
capacity of 20 deliveries per year. Unless there is a significant 
increase in this capacity, it will take the commercial instrument 
manufacturers 7+ years to reach this level of an installed 
instrument base. This becomes a concern considering the 
dynamic nature of laser-based technology, which implies a 
more rapid obsolescence than in the mature camera market. 
3.4. Review of Assumptions 
It is important to review the assumptions made in projecting the 
total installed instrument base to identify possible biases and 
areas for further study. 
Installed Instrument Base: The information used to determine 
the installed base of laser altimetry sensors, the year-over-year 
growth, the booked and projected orders for 2000 and the 
geographical distribution of instruments, was provided by 
various sources and hence is open to some interpretation and 
bias. In general, the total installed base does agree with a 
recently published review of airborne laser scanning systems 
that included bathymetric lidar systems. (Baltsavias, 1999b). 
Further review of the database complied for this study over the 
next 12 months will be useful to help revise these estimates. 
For reference, a detailed industry directory is maintained by the 
author at www.airbornelasermapping.com and updated versions 
of the tables presented above will be available throughout 2000. 
While there is some degree of uncertainty in the absolute 
numbers presented, there is general agreement from most 
sources that the current base of instruments is 35 - 40 with an 
additional 20+ instruments likely to be in the field by mid 2001. 
Size of Aerial Camera Market: The data on the size and 
growth of the aerial film camera market are anecdotal best 
estimates. Variations of £10% can easily be expected. More 
detailed research in to this market would help to refine these 
numbers and provide a better basis for the resulting estimates of 
laser altimetry instruments that may eventually be installed. In 
addition, regional breakdowns of aerial camera distributions 
would help to allow for regional projections of laser altimetry. 
A more comprehensive review of aerial survey company size 
and organizational resources would be instructive to help better 
define barriers and price points that may need to be addressed if 
this client-base for laser altimetry sensors is to be captured. 
10% Penetration of Market: This critical figure is an educated 
assumption (i.e. a "guess") based on a conservative approach to 
estimating the total market for laser altimetry. A more detailed 
survey of aerial survey companies along with greater education 
of this community about the benefits of laser altimetry would 
help to better define the percentage of this client-base that may 
be targeted as primary adopters of laser altimetry. Interactions 
between price points and potential demand could also be 
investigated. It should also be noted that an estimate based on 
the established aerial camera market ignores any new entrants 
to the field who may create additional demand for instruments. 
4. CONCLUSIONS 
The development of a competitive commercial airborne laser 
altimetry sector within the remote sensing community will be 
dependent in part upon the availability of a mature, reliable 
instrument base. Maturing the technology and increasing its 
acceptance by the end-user community requires both a 
technology road map and effective forward planning on the part 
of the stakeholders in instrument design and development. A 
review of the commercial sector since 1995 shows a growing 
increase in the number of instruments installed worldwide with 
continued growth projected for at least the next 12 - 18 months. 
It is estimated that the currently installed base of ~40 systems 
will expand to ~60 by the end of 2000. The annual growth rate 
for the instrument base has been between 25% - 35% over the 
last three years with an increase in the percentage of 
commercial off-the-shelf instruments compared to proprietary 
systems. A preliminary estimate of the number of laser 
altimetry instruments that may eventually be installed 
worldwide has been made based on the aerial camera market. It 
   
     
    
  
    
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
     
     
     
   
   
    
     
    
   
   
   
    
   
    
    
    
    
   
    
    
   
    
    
    
    
    
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.