canopy structure classes and the total volume occupied by
vegetation material, as measured by the combined volume of
the euphotic and oligophotic zones.
Euphotic/
Oligophotic
Threshold
Cumulative Canopy Closur
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 3W14, La Jolla, CA, 9-11 Nov. 1999
Open
Gap
Space
10
TZ
60
] Euphotic
Zone
E 4 | Oligophotic
= Zone
= 1
=
1
1 Closed
3 Gap
Space
0.1
Canopy Closure
Empty/Filled Threshold Value
à $ Oligo. Zone.
7
Fig. 4. The Canopy Volume Method (Lefsky et al., 1999b)
Fig. 5 presents canopy volume profile diagrams for
representative young, mature and old-growth plots. These
diagrams indicate, for each 1 meter vertical interval, the
percent of each plot's 25 waveforms that belong to each of the
four canopy structure classes. Young stands are characterized
by short stature, a uniform canopy surface (as indicated by the
height distribution of the interface between the euphotic zone
and open gap space), and an absence of empty space within the
canopy (ie. closed gap space). Mature stands are taller, but still
are characterized by a uniform upper canopy surface. In
contrast to young stands, mature stands have a large volume of
closed gap space. Mature stands of Douglas-fir often have a
high density of large trees with uniform DBH. The uniformity
of size leads to the uniform canopy surface height, and the
interception of light and other resources by these trees results in
the absence of canopy material at lower levels. Old-growth
stands are distinguished from mature stands by their uneven
canopy surface, and the wide vertical distribution of each of the
four canopy structure classes. Whereas stands from earlier
stages in stand development have canopy structure classes in
distinct vertical layers, in the old-growth stands each canopy
structure class occurs throughout the height range of the stands.
The continuous distribution of canopy surfaces from the top of
the canopy to the ground has been cited as a key physical
feature of old-growth forests distinguishing them from the
simpler canopies of young and mature stands (Spies and
Franklin, 1991)
Scatterplots of predicted vs observed stand structure attributes
are presented in Fig. 6. The strength of the relationships
developed here are very strong in comparison to other remote
sensing techniques, and compare favorably with allometric
equations relating complementary aspects of individual tree
geometry. Examination of the scatterplots indicates that the
predicted values of aboveground biomass and LAI show no
asymptotic tendency, even at extremely large values (1200
Mg/ha Biomass, LAI of 12). The equation predicting biomass
involved positive correlations with the total filled volume, and
the number of waveforms taller than 55 m. The equation
predicting LAI involved a positive correlation with the total
filled volume and the open gap volume, and a negative
correlation with the closed gap volume. This may be interpreted
as suggesting that the all-sided surface area of leaves is
proportional to the volume they are distributed in. Increases in
the vertical range of the upper canopy surface tends to increase
height (m)
height (m)
Intern
LAI, and the pr
to decrease LAI
use the total
scatterplots anc
values of each
other than the o
Young Stand
0 Volum
Old- growtl
(~250 ys
60
Ts
©
N
o
g RUM RD-C
-= 100
Observed
00 À
01*
204
-200 20
Predic!
Bio
Fig. 6. Predic
Metho
The developme
sensing will :
organization, a
organization. U
made several i
sensor with tw