ch. 3 
     
  
  
  
  
ch.2 ouf > Then | = a 
Lis WO2T)=a2 WOuT) + b, nig: WT) 25 WO LT) bs 
12.04. p. 405 
| $ 10.04 s 3.64 
* : 
E 8.04 40[c) "é 324 
Y = 
5 au s 2.87 
S 404 20x). e 244 
= - = 
= = 20 
= 20 = 2.07 
"t3 
© Nom ch. 1 c Te ch.1 
em 0 "T T T T T 1 "4 CC 16 T T T T T - zi 
uo 0 20 40 60 80 100 10x10 0 20 40 60 8.0 100 120 X10 
Radiance [ wien'pm-or) ] | Radiance [ wem] 
Fig.4 Relation between radiance Fig.5 Relation between radiance 
| of ch.1(4.3-5.5um) and that of ch.1(4.3-5.5um) and that 
| of ch.2(4.5-4.9ym). of ch.3(10.5-12.5um). 
Solid line is: obtained by Solid curve is obtained by 
[ym] the simulation using Planck's the simulation. 
law and the spectral sensi- Broken line indicates 
tivity of the total optical linearity assumption (13b). 
system of the MSS. 
Line which indicates linearity 
assumption (13a) overlaps the 
simulated line in this figure. 
Practical Range in 
  
  
  
1.0 r Aircraft Remote Sensing 
a inp 
0.9F Path length 
[km] : 
I um - À} | 
u : 
= 0.8} : 
= i 
> : 
e P : 
T : 
A € ' 
Tee = 0.77 ' 
= | 
5.0 [km] i 
0.6 : 
ice 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0 10.0 20.0 50.0 100.0 [mm] 
2 in PRECIPITABLE WATER 
Fig.6 Simulated value of l as a function of water vapor and path length. 
325