on due to 
aluate the 
to 11.5 which 
in*Fig 6 
eak-to-peak 
"22 was shown 
t angle was 
by 15 Kain 
ere seems 
ture and solar 
nstantly 
| the influ- 
ature was 
8. For the 
h increases. 
ure approaches 
indicating 
n. In the 
n Ts and snow 
ive data 
| of dry snow 
‘or wet snow 
as discussed 
Ss temperature 
ion but its 
'Tature was 
. brightness 
inge up to 
he possibility 
lationship 
prospect was 
he two 
rarious snow 
-ablishment 
> 
the experiment. 
1ge'' , Radio 
ytimum sensor 
E-20,1982. 
3) 
4) 
5) 
6) 
7 j 
  
Stiles,W.H. and F.T.Ulaby,'"The active and passive microwave response to 
snow parameters,l.wetness' ,Journal of Geophysical Res.,85,1980. 
Ulaby F.T. and W.H.Stiles,"The active and passive microwave response to 
snow parameters,2.water equivalent of dry snow',Journal of Geophysical 
Res.,85,1045-1049,1980. 
Tiuri M.and Schultz H.,"Theoretical and experimental studies of micro- 
wave radiation from a natural snow field'",Sensing of Snowpack Properties, 
Fort Collins, 1980 
England A.W.,"Thermal microwave emission from a halfspace containing 
scatters', Radio Science, Vol.9,447-454,1974. 
England A.W. ,"Thermal microwave emission from a scattering layer", 
Journal of Geophysical Res., Vol. 80, 1975