A F RICA
RELATIVE LOCATION
OF STUDY AREA
Figure 1
Z
1982 CMS.
uses. (FAO, 1980). These causations are further aggravated by increasing popu-
lations, increased demand for food and greater energy needs in the face of
diminishing supplies. |t is, therefore, essential to develop innovative approaches
in resources management which can meet the increasing needs whi le protecting
and maintaining the environment of Kenya.
Kenya, with an area of over 500,000 square kilometers, dissected by the
Great Rift Valley, provides a wide range of physiographic features as well as
climatic regimes. The latter is closely tied to the elevation changes from sea
level to 5,200 meters on top of Mount Kenya fueled by two opposing climatic
patterns. Kenya's forests are of the upper and lower montane types and consti-
tute only three percent of the total land cover of the country. The former type
are conifer and comprise the largest forest area in Kenya. The lower montane are
semi-tropical rain forest of broad leaf evergreens. The upper montane forests
are the most significant for Kenya in economic terms (Doute, 1980).
Nature's ecological harmony depends on its ecological balance. The dis-
ruption of this balance through changes other than slow evolutionary processes
results potentially in detrimental alteration of the environment. Unchecked
deforestation of the Mau Forest results in soil erosion, reduction of water
catchment potential, increased stream siltation, disruption of the aquatic eco-
system, added danger of more severe flooding, destruction of agricultural lands
and further reduction of hydro-electric potential for the region (The Weekly
Review, 1982). Presently, deforestation has resulted in all of the above in the
Mau Forest and the socio-economic implications for this region associated with
this practice cannot be readily absorbed by the economy of the country.
To prevent unchecked deforestation in any region, it is necessary to apply
monitoring techniques suitable for any specific geographic area. It is not un-
common to find extensive air surveys and field surveys to monitor parts of Europe
or the United States of America. However, these time and money consuming tech-
niques are frequently not available in so-called less developed nations such as
Kenya (Doute et al., 1980). Furthermore, the whole concept of forest manage-
ment may be fairly new to the government of such developing nations and coupled
with limited financial resources the idea of repetitive air photo coverage,
ideally suited for this purpose, may be remote at best. Therefore, alternative
options or avenues must be explored to be applied to effective forest management
of such
avai lab
ment an
(Miller
Th
foreste
discrim
3) fore
and 4)
data pre
nations
METHODO!
A.
Nakuru :
heavily
prime re
related
of the Y
were mac
correla
Season «
B.
was obti
These p:
cloud f.
interva
encroacl
readi ly
althougl
in surf:
1982; Bi
The
tapes (!
Scenes v
400. TI
I nformat
of this
(512 by
consist:
i ntegrat
The proc
environn
both sur
timely «
based ur
algoritt
groups v
land cov
C.
is to de
the temp
cover ce
then com