hes ;
pro-
pean
rved.
JL in
18 in
nte-
.0lds
ven
aere
tted
. the
n to
clear
d its
ence
n in
m I
Che
Jdvo-
mse-
ate.
rom
osed
18
2an-
are
dies
will
ipal
the
Ta
cure
Can
nan
{em
v in
a of
sual
ver-
ag of
OPENING ADDRESS.
101
the nation were available for study, under the guidance of competent
osersons, without reference to honors, and without formal and prolonged
surricula, very many well qualified scholars—some who have graduated
and some who have never been in college ; men and women ; foreigners
and Americans ; some in early and some in later life—would there be
gathered, and would be aided, taught, inspired by the opportunities and
nfluences thrown open to them, in an amplitude worthy of the national
sapital.
The last word has not been said in respect to the higher education of
yomen. ‘Three views are prevalent. At one extreme are those who
would not open the doors of any high school on the same terms to men
and women. They believe that the sexes can be taught in a better way
in separate institutions. They believe that, through a series of influences
extending over many centuries, women in civilized countries—certainly in
sircles where refinement, education, and religion are prevalent—have been
protected from the harsher and rougher influences of the world, and have
oeen relieved from burdens which their fathers, brothers, husbands, and
sons have been, as a rule, most willing to bear. To those who dwell upon
-his aspect of the question, absolute coeducation seems to be a retrograde
step. It may, however, be conceded that ere long, perhaps hencefor-
ward, women are to have equal advantages with men in the pursuit of
advanced education ; and it is certainly demonstrated that their powers
of acquiring knowledge are equal to those of men.
At the opposite extreme are those who claim that women will equal
men, if they have an opportunity, in the professions of law, medicine,
and theology, and in scientific and literary pursuits ; that many are now
prepared for and eager for university opportunities ; and that it would be
a waste of force, even if it were practicable at the moment, to duplicate
such foundations as are open to men. To those who hold these opinions,
coeducation seems essential.
Between these extremes another view is held. The intermediates would
open to both sexes the advantages of university instruction, but would
do so under such arrangements as will secure to women the supervision
and counsel of women, as to men the supervision and counsel of men.
The experience acquired in the colleges for women associated with the uni-
versities of Cambridge and Oxford, and in our own country the remark-
able success which has attended what is called the Annex of Harvard
University, indicate to many the solution of the problem, unless, indeed,
around such a foundation as Bryn Mawr or another woman’s college the
aot impossible nor undesirable university for women should be developed.
in comparison with the subjects already named, it may seem that the
question of residence in a university is of very slight importance ; but is
shis true in places where the education of youth, the development of char-
acter. and the formation of moral, mental, and social habits are deemed