LIBERAL EDUCATION IN LAW, MEDICINE, AND THEOLOGY. 113
BE
ND
‘ersity,
1 this
vofes-
0 any
ree a
ality
as a
Jues-
sities
t but
nity,
itera-
igher
.ty of
uence
~st of
-part-
The
culty
lege
* the
5 not
who
and
em,
ents
the
<2ent
pro-
it. of
ree,
move
or of
rrees
). D.
iver-
ation
JOL.
1tset
0lnt
Jans
elf,
:0m -
the
ndividual will be willing to tarry for before entering on the practice of
ais profession. To which shall we give greater weight, the self-interest
»f the individual or the self-interest of the community ? The community,
if it be wise, will be anxious to see practical knowledge advanced all along
‘he line; will wish the physician to be something more than an empiric,
sapable himself of sure-footed search for the origins and determining con-
litions of disease ; will desire to find in the preacher something larger
ind more generous in temper and endowment than dogmatism—even the
liberal spirit of a serious and withal practical philosophy ; will look for
lignified parts of learning in the lawyer, something better than practical
shrewdness and successful chicane, a capacity to rise at need to the point
of view of the jurist, as if aware of the great and permanent principles of
large-eyed justice. The average individual, on the other hand, will be
sager to make his way as rapidly as possible to business; and when once
business engagements begin to press upon him, his thought will adjust
itself to them. If the habit of carrying special cases up into the region of
general principles—where alone the real light of discovery burns—be not
‘ormed during the period of preparation, it will hardly come afterward,
when the special cases crowd fast and the general principles remain remote.
Only the pastor has any leisure then for the higher sort of study, and even
ae is not likely to begin it then if he has never known before what it is
and what it may do for him. The old women, and the young, will pre-
rent his becoming studious if he be not already a confirmed student. safe
in “his pensive citadel.”
An antecedent liberal education, it must of course be admitted, does
not necessarily disclose general principles ; is too often so ¢/liberal in its
survey of subjects as to leave upon the mind no trace of the generalizing
habit. But usually it is liberal, at any rate, in being general ; and, with-
out a survey of the field of knowledge, a various view of the interests of
the mind, it is hard to see how a man is to discern the relations of things,
apon the perception of which all just thought must rest. It is something
simply to have traversed many fields of thought, to have seen where they
lie, and how surrounded, with what coasts, what natural, what “scientific”
boundaries. It is something to have made ‘the grand tour,” even under
ndifferent tutors ; something to have had a Wanderjahr, if only to see
she world of men and things. A man who has not had an antecedent
iberal education can certainly never get a subsequent equivalent; and,
without it, he must remain shut in by a narrow horizon, imagining the
confines of knowledge to lie very close about him on every side. Such is
she ““ practical ” physician, lawyer, or preacher who now rides us like the
Old Man of the Sea, monarch of his little isle of expert knowledge until
we can drug and dislodge him.
The world woke once, in that notable fifteenth century, to find itself
standing in the clear dawn of the New Learning, and the light which then