ne
ire
an
wal
re
con
ar
Ne
ind
ur
ald
on
ore
-he
een
ry-
tor
ere
ho
‘he
ac-
Lal
or
nd
in
uty
ion
us
mn-
of
oy
2al
1a
7s,
nis
m-
re
ar,
Ar-
me
3X-
. as
es,
ub-
ets
AS.
all
ate
wer
1 of
ADAPTATION OF METHODS OF INSTRUCTION. 301
things to nature in that former time, as there is now in tracing them to absolute self-
activity ?
So, ho, there is the religious will. It is when we determine our conduct by its har-
mony with this highest ideal of worthiness that we have piety of will. And the soul as
leeling may love, revere, and worship its highest ideal of worthiness. This is piety of
teeling. The life is the unity of the activities of intellect, feeling, and will ; or, in differ-
ant words. the self realizes its life in the unity of these activities. When the self lives in
the consciousness of the relation of all that is, to the supreme unity. or ideal, or source,
the life is to that extent religious.
The proper teaching of every subject, as I see it, is a step toward the recognition of
she supreme cause in that which is studied. It is an advance in the apprehension of
what is truer and worthier and more to be revered. What is morality but the recognition
of a worthier ideal that is to be realized in the life? Morality is the discharge of duty.
Duty presupposes a higher ideal than what now exists in my life. I must make (hisideal
3 reality by the deed. The essential difference between religion and morality isin the supe-
rior worthiness of the ideal. If what I have tried to show is true, then morality and religion
name merely different degrees of worthiness of the ideals. We see, too, that a religious
duty in one period in the development of the race may become a moral duty in a later
period. I am of the opinion that every child in its growth is repeating the experience of
che race. In a child-like way it regards its parents or teacher very much as it comes to
regard its highest id=al in subsequent life. It seems to me, therefore, that if we think of
a child’s life as we ought, the question of whether moral instruction should be separated
from religious instruction could never arise.
That it does arise with us is probably due to substituting theology for religion as a
subject of instruction. Statements of doctrine and certain religious forms or sanctions
are mistaken for religion. They become mere formalism to the child if it is required to
learn them. A gentleman in another room a few days ago said that the attempt to teach
children what they were not ready to receive produced intellectual dyspepsia. I fear
that the teaching of doctrinal theology in the form commonly pursued in the teaching
of so-called religion tends to produce religious dyspepsia in children. As those who
teach come to know how children think and feel, with what ideas and ideals their world
is filled, they will cease to discuss a question of this kind. They will find the moral and
religious natures of the child so blended that it will not cceur to them that the two
should be dissected out and shut up in separate departments. They will see that the
great thing to do is to stimulate the child’s natural reverence for worthiness. When the
feeling of reverence for what is conceived to be worthy is the habit of the mind, we may
wait for time to develop the distinctively religious life in so far as it differs from the
moral life.
ADAPTATION OF METHODS OF INSTRUCTION TO
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF THE CHILD
Tue CHAIRMAN, General Eaton, on introducing this subject, stated: ¢¢ Professor Graham
Bell is unable to be present to-day, to speak to you upon the necessary adaptation of
methods of instruction to meet special conditions of the child in overcoming defects of
nearing, speech, ete.
““ Professor Bell's father and his grandfather made the human voice and hearing a
special study. His father devised a plan for training in articulation, and for teaching
:he deaf and dumb to speak. Professor Graham Bell came to this country, and began
;0 teach this subject. His study of the production of sound, and the means of hearing
sound, led to the invention of the telephone.
“ Frequently pupils fail to make progress in school because of the imperfect condition
of one or more of the organs of sense. Many of these pupils might be greatly benefited
and advanced if their teachers understood the nature of the defects, and the proper
steps to be taken toward overcoming them.
““You know of Laura Bridgman, who could neither see, hear, nor speak. Her sense
of feeling was the only perfect sense left her. She learned to read with her fingers, but
she never learned to sneak.