188 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF EDUCATION.
has come to be generally accepted. This recognition of the educational
power of drawing has led to a demand for its exercise. Therefore,
drawing now stands in the schools mainly on an educational basis, and is
regarded by educators as a means of expression which deserves the highest
rank. Its value industrially is more fully recognized than ever before,
while its value educationally is considered as far transcending its industrial
value.
It is recognized that the body of the child deserves to be clothed and
fed and housed ; but it is still farther recognized that the mind of the
child deserves recognition, and must be nurtured and given opportunity
for expression.
Supervisors of drawing are leading in this movement, and are develop-
ing the child through his own observations and thought to free expression,
and are, moreover, endeavoring to gnide that freedom into well-recognized
art methods. The hard, thin, black, wiry line, finished by the most
painstaking effort to absolute uniformity of width and absolute want of
expression, has given place to the broader, soft gray line—the true line of
che pencil—varying in intensity, delicacy, strength, or emphasis, to meet
she thought expressed, thus admitting the possibilities of the whole range
of expression from light to dark. They are also leading more and more
to the observation of the beautiful as the best means of elevating the
expression of the children.
Recognizing the great value of drawing in the whole educational field,
[ shared in the presentation of an exhibit of work in form study, drawing,
and color, in connection with other studies, made at the meeting of the
National Educational Association at Topeka about seven years since. It
was, I think, the first exhibit of this sort ever made. The work had then,
as it has now, a great amount of crudity. The regular work in drawing
was not considered as bearing upon the drawing in connection with other
studies. The two were entirely divorced in the minds of the teachers, and
one did not influence the other. This is a surprising result, but it finds
its parallel in the fact that a student may be most carefully trained in the
ws of perspective and the mechanical method of using them, and vet
oe helpless in the presence of a single object whose appearance Lo the eye
he is required to draw. A student who had passed one hundred per cent.
in instrumental perspective in a well-known art school came to me in
great distress one day. She wanted to draw the interior of a barn, and
she was very much puzzled to know whether she should make the beams
overhead converge toward the upper edge of the picture or otherwise.
Such things seem hardly credible to those who understand not only instru-
mental perspective, but also its connection with the appearance of objects.
I well remember with what a contemptuous dissent a modest suggestion
‘0 the principal of that school—that it would be better to lead the student
'0 see the appearance of an object before studying the principles of per-