RADIATIVE EQUILIBRIUM
103
/
re par-
give it.
oidable
ions of
satisfy
ids out
only a
natical
em the
) select
to get
diether
faculty
public
,red to
s some
lade,
atician
nished
nating
Le does
bn this.
) other
oblem,
mport-
istified
e risks
curred
ention
is eyes
aetical
ite the
do not
emises
bilities
es. If
where
must
tician.
The point to remember is that when we 'prove a result without under
standing it—when it drops unforeseen out of a maze of mathematical
formulae—we have no ground for hoping that it will apply except when
the mathematical premises are rigorously fulfilled—that is to say, never,
unless we happen to be dealing with something like aether to which
‘‘perfection” can reasonably be attributed. But when we obtain by
mathematical analysis an understanding of a result—when we discern
which of the conditions are essentially contributing to it and which are
relatively unimportant—we have obtained knowledge adapted to the fluid
premises of a natural physical problem.
I think the idea that the purpose of study is to arrive at a string of
proofs of propositions is a little overdone even in pure mathematics. Our
purpose in studying the physical world includes much that is not com
prised in so narrow an ideal. We might indeed say that, whereas for
the mathematician insight is one of the tools and proof the finished
product, for the physicist proof is one of the tools and insight the finished
product. The tool must not usurp the place of the product, even though
we fully recognise that disastrous results may occur when the tool is
badly handled.
73. We now give an alternative derivation of the fundamental equation
(71T) which enables some points of detail to be discussed.
In isotropic radiation of density E the density of that part travelling
in directions included within a solid angle da> is
Since the flow of energy in a star is not perfectly isotropic but depends
on the angle 6 between dœ and the direction of the radius we shall denote
the energy-density of radiation within the solid angle dœ by
Consider a small cylinder of length ds and cross-section dS with its
length in the direction 6. The infinitesimal dœ is considered to be small
compared with dS/ds 2 , so that the divergence of the beam in the cylinder is
negligible and the radiation within dœ travels along the cylinder.
The amount entering the cylinder per second through the base is
gh in-
th the
The amount leaving at the top is
(73-2).