e change is
(absorption
equilibrium
t after the
chamber,
evade the
matter of
nission and
bter just as
nd contrac-
Le adiabatic
act, setting
ion has re-
gy-density;
al state.
) no entropy
mtropy has
adiation to
luced. But
equilibrium
so that the
>een created
it has never
to convert,
wersibly by
istitution is
en—moving
wave is re-
t there is a
lowering of
>"molly on a
density and
the Doppler
....(33-1).
n-equilibrium
tician.
The pressure on the walls is E + E' (§21). The work done on the walls
per sq. cm. per sec. is therefore (E + E') V. This must be equal to the
difference of energy of the incident and reflected waves, viz. Ec — E'c per
sq. cm. per sec. Hence
(E—E')c = (E + E')V (33-2).
By (33-1) and (33-2)
*/ E' c - V
' E ~c+V
If the incidence is oblique the same result is obtained except that
V must now be the velocity of the reflector resolved in the oblique direction.
We express the quantity E/v in units called quanta*. By (33-3)
E/v = E'/v', that is to say, the number of quanta is unaltered by reflection at
moving walls.
Consider a small change of volume of the chamber causing a change of
temperature of the radiation from T to T + dT. During this change let
a quantum of frequency v change to frequency v by one or more reflections
at the moving walls and write
v = v' (1 + <5) (33*4).
Then by (33-3) s depends on the circumstances of the reflections, but not
on v. Hence if we denote by g (s) ds the proportion of the reflected quanta
for which this coefficient lies between s and s + ds, g ( s ) will be the same
function whatever frequency v we are considering, since there is no correla
tion between v and s.
By definition
Let
f g (s) ds = 1
[ sg(s)ds = s 0
....(33-5).
Then s 0 is independent of v.
Let J ( v , T) dv be the number of quanta of frequency v to v + dv in
the chamber when the temperature is T , then
J {v, T + dT) dv' = I g (s) ds J (v, T) dv,
where the integral on the right is taken over all values of s, and (for each
value of s) v and dv are related to the fixed values v , dv' by (33-4). Hence
substituting for v and dv
J (/, T + dT) —\g (s) ds (l + s)J(v'(l + s), T).
* We use the modern nomenclature, but do not here introduce any of the
principles of the quantum theory. The “number of quanta” is not assumed to be
an integral number.