- 116 -
Fig. 1 - Sketch with the position of the nymphaea in the
adjacents ’’House of the Small Fountain” (top) and
“House of the Big Fountain” (bottom).
2. TECHNIQUES APPLIED
2.1 Photogrammetry
The subject of the surveys (the nymphaea in Pompeii) is
generally of a relative small size, with different kind of
geometric characteristics, from a very simple structure to quite
complex surfaces.
For the photogrammetric image acquisition, and mainly due to
handiness requirements, the choice has been for small and
medium format semimetric cameras, but also a calibrated digital
camera was adopted. In particular were used Leica R5 (24x36
mm) and Fuji 690III (60x90 mm) film based cameras with
reseau (equipped with wide angle and normal lenses) and Nikon
D1 digital camera equipped with a wide angle lens.
Normal and convergent photos were acquired, in order to apply
classical stereoscopic plotting but also in some cases
monoscopic non conventional techniques. A solution for a good
stereoscopic coverage is represented by the use of the Cyclop
system (Menci and Rinaudo, 2000). It is a single camera system
(fig.2) that, simulating the use of a bi-camera, provides a
specific software for mono- and stereo-restitution without
requiring a topographic survey for ground control points
determination.
Fig. 2 - House of the Small Fountain: digital data acquisition
using the Cyclop system.
To provide a solution for the exterior orientation problem, three
different approaches are applied:
error ellipses of few millimetres, for the point determination
and for the absolute orientation;
- the scaling of the 3D model, derived from a relative
orientation, by using distance measurements between well
defined points;
- the employing of the Cyclop system as a bi-camera, with a
base value of 1.20, 0.90, 0.60 or 0.30 m depending on the
size of the object (therefore adequate to the case in
question).
The orientation procedures (inner and exterior) are performed
using a PC-based digital photogrammetric workstation
(StereoView, Nikon Instruments) and also by an analytical
stereoplotter (Digicart40, Siscam).
Different products were until now produced and their use
considered with archaeologists:
- classical large scale three-dimensional vector restitution,
either by analytical and digital stereoplotters;
- monoscopic restitution of the main structure using digital
photogrammetric programs, aided by automatic correlation
and epipolar constraints for homologous point collimation;
- design of profiles and sections;
- digital surface model determination, either by manual
operation and by automatic matching procedures;
- digital rectified photos and orthophotos.
Some examples are shown below, relative to surface modelling
and derived orthophotos. Orthophotos, despite the difficulty of
their application in architecture, provide a very powerful tool
for restoration and documentation of monuments and materials;
for their generation the capabilities of image matching
procedures could be successfully exploited but they require
appropriate a-posteriori manual editing (Baratin et al., 2000).
Figure 3 shows the results of a comparison between manual and
automatic (without editing) DSM generation, at a 10 cm grid
spacing, for the Small Fountain nymphaeum; the surface was
K M
1 i 1 I 1 N I
iv»«i«nia a i i a i a i
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
- a conventional topographical survey of the GCPs, using
special retro-reflective targets and high precision total
stations (with normal EDM or reflectorless system): this
solution provides the best results in terms of accuracy, with
Fig. 3 - House of the Small Fountain: test for validation of
automatic surface modelling (without editing) vs.
manual DSM restitution on a simple mesh; values in m.