625
One model is designed for bare soils and the
other for vegetation canopies. They both
assume that the polarised reflectance is
generated by single specular reflection over
isotropically distributed facets (bare soil) or
leaves (vegetation). The two physically based
models need only one variable parameter; the
refractive index of the reflecting medium.
We found a very good agreement between
the model predictions and the surface
measurements, collected in the field over
various surface coverages and solar angles. In
particular the observations confirm that, for
similar geometry, the polarised reflectance
generated by the bare soil is much larger than
that generated by the vegetation. The largest
polarised reflectances observed over bare soils
are on the order of 0.12, whereas they never
exceed 0.03 over the vegetation. The model
accurately reproduce the polarised reflectance
angular signature for zenith angles up to about
55°. For larger zenith viewing angles, the
approximations concerning the mutual
shading of reflecting elements fail, and the
observations are smaller than the model
predictions.
At aircraft level, the polarised radiance
generated by the surface is ambiguously
mixed with that resulting from aerosol and
molecular scattering. Moreover, atmospheric
scattering reduces the signal from the surface.
Thus, the measurements are difficult to
interpret in terms of surface reflectance.
Besides, since the surface polarised reflectance
depends mostly on the vegetation cover, our
results suggest that its information content is
small. There is a negative correlation between
the NDVI and the polarised reflectance which
confirms that bare soils generate more
polarisation than vegetation.
On the other hand polarised reflectance may
be used for aerosol remote sensing. This is
particularly true since the surface models
shown in this paper allow one to predict the
surface polarised reflectance. However, the
airborne measurements acquired during the
Hapex-Sahel campaign suggest that desertic
aerosols yield little polarisation. In fact, as the
aerosol optical thickness increases, the increase
in polarised radiance generated by aerosol
scattering is compensated by the decrease of
that resulting from other processes (masking
effect).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Both the REFPOL and the POLDER
instruments have been designed, build,
serviced and operated by the Laboratoire
d'Optique Atmosphérique (LOA), Lille,
France, with a sponsorship from the Centre
National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) and
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
(CNRS). We acknowledge the work of many
individuals from this laboratory who made
this study possible.
REFERENCES
Bréon, F.M., D. Tanré, P. Lecomte, and M.
Herman; 1994: Bare Soils and Vegetation
Polarized Reflectance: Measurements and
Models. IEEE Trans. Geosc. Rem. Sens.
Submitted.
Bréon, F.M. and P.Y. Deschamps; 1993: Optical
and Physical parameter retrieval from
POLDER measurements over the ocean
using an analytical model. Rem. Sens.
Environ., 43,193-209.
Coulson, K.L.; 1966: Effect of reflections
properties of natural surfaces in aerial
reconnaissance. Appl. Optics, 5,905.
Curran, P.J., 1978:,A Photographic Method for
Recording of Polarized Visible Light for
Soil Surface Moisture Indications. Rem.
Sens. Env., 7,305-322.
Curran, P.J., 1981: The Relationship Between
Polarized Visible Light and Vegetation
Amount. Rem. Sens. Environ., 11,87-92.
Curran, P.J., 1982: Polarized visible light as an
aid to vegetation classification. Rem. Sens.
Environ., 12,491-499.
Deschamps, P.Y., F.M. Bréon, A. Bricaud, J.C.
Buriez, M. Herman, M. Leroy, A. Podaire,
G. Sèze; 1994: The POLDER mission:
Instrument characteristics and scientific
objectives. IEEE Trans. Geosc. Rem. Sens.
Accepted
Deuzé, J.L., F.M. Bréon, J.L. Roujean, P.Y.
Deschamps, C. Devaux, M. Herman, and A.
Podaire; 1993: Analysis of the POLDER
(POLarization and Directionality of Earth's
Reflectances) Airborne Instrument
observations over Land Surfaces. Rem. Sens.
Env., 45,137-154.
Egan, W.G.; 1968: Aircraft polarimetric and
photometric observations. Proc. 5th Int.
Symp. Rem. Sens, of Env., Univ. of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, pp 169-189.
Egan, W.G.; 1970: Optical Stokes Parameters
for Farm Crops Identification. Rem. Sens.
Env., 1,165-180.
Fitch, B.W., R.L. Walraven, and D.E. Bradley;
1984: Polarization of Light reflected from
grain crops during the heading growth
stage, Rem. Sens. Env., 15,263-268.