- 601 -
over the
selected
hey are
rements
73)
in equa-
ending on
lar place
g system
computer-
x 185 km.)
ite, the
1 form
ly along
n four
s Band 4
red -
ters) ;
two
e electro-
m energy
black and
ere are
ee difier
en, red
is a
ned to the
ay be red
ROS Data
e Canadian
The images
n of
the 18.5 x
vide a
lly plani
er very
are in-
a single
land use
ons that
atures
rty of
the image is one of its two major characteristics. Unlike the
Gemini and Apollo pictures, ERTS images have the unique property
of being readily joined together in mosaics. This greatly
increases the synoptic character of this imagery and extends the
assessment of contextual relationships to regional and even
subcontinental proportions. Proper processing can so minimize
the join or match line differences between successive scenes in
a single orbital strip, between adjacent strips on successive
days, and even between strips or individual scenes obtained
in different orbital cycles, that only careful, close-up inspec
tion of a mosaic would detect tonal variations. Previously,
mosaics of imagery from high-flying aircraft have had abrupt
tonal changes, distortions resulting from the lens system,
change in illumination during the time of flight, and, moreover,
they were very costly.
The other major characteristic of ERTS imagery is its
repetitive coverage, enabling us to view one area under the con
ditions which are experienced at different seasons of the year.
This property does not mean that ERTS imagery is restricted to
interpretation of time-dependent features; rather it means that
relatively permanent features such as geological structures and
landforms may be viewed on a regional scale with many different
conditions of vegetation growth, snow cover or soil moisture.
We may therefore select imagery for that season which gives us
the clearest view of the features we are investigating.
ERTS therefore provides us with a regional view of the
earth’s surface at different seasons of the year, and because
of the high altitude and imaging system, the image is virtually
an orthophotograph or photo map.
INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATIONS OF ERTS-1 IMAGES
Interpretation is the transposition of remotely-sensed data
into useful information (Gregory, October, 1973). The quality
of these translations depends largely on the experience and
knowledge of the interpreter. Interpretation of ERTS data by an
experienced interpreter, with due allowance for differences in
the scale of observation and the size of the features, is as
valid as his inferences from observations in the field.
ERTS data does not provide as much detailed information as is
obtainable by a field study, but, on the other hand, the
regional significance of a feature will frequently not be
appreciated without the synoptic overview of ERTS imagery.
Interpretation is a matter of human judgement; prior experience
and accumulated wisdom are fundamental to interpretation.
The quality of interpretations will therefore vary from person
to person.