382
components. When maximum values of greeness for corn
and soybean were plotted against time it was found
that a simple linear classifier could separate the
two.
This work carried out in the United States shows
clear advantages in using multitemporal Landsat data
in crop classification, though the range of crops
considered has been limited with a concentration of
work on corn - soybean separation. The range of crops
grown in an area, the field pattern, and most
importantly the timing of the image within the
agricultural calendar can be identified as the three
key factors limiting the sucess of crop
classification from Landsat.
In the West European agricultural situation, crops
that are phenologically very similar such as winter
wheat, winter barley and spring cereals are often
produced in adjacent blocks. When this is combined
with the production of oilseeds, root and vegetable
crops, over very small geographical regions then the
picture presented to the scanner is one of great
spectral complexity. However, if Landsat MSS image
aquisition can be matched to key points of change in
the crop calendar and combined as multitemporal data
sets, then the differences in the temporal-spectral
profiles of even phenologically similar crops may be
sufficient for accurate crop identification.
The sucessful application of the temporal dimension
as an aid to crop classification in the United States
suggests that a similar approach may improve the crop
classification accuracy in the more complex West
European agricultural situation. To investigate this,
two main objectives were defined, firlstly to
identify the optimum single * date for crop
classification, and secondly to examine changes in
crop classification accuracy through the use of
single date and multitemporal data with reference to
the United Kingdom agricultural situation.
2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
A test site was established in an area of diverse
cereal, oilseed and vegetable crop production in
Southern England. The exact location was an area of
625 square kilometers centred on Framlingham,
Suffolk. Some 2000 Ha of ground data was available in
the form of farm records showing field boundaries and
crop type.
A search through the National tape archive for
Landsat data from 1972 - 1984 was carried out. Table
2.1 shows all available images of reasonable quality
for the Framlingham area.
Table 2.1 Image availability
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1974
1975
***
1976
***
***
1977
***
1978
•kkk kkk
1979
***
*** *** ***
1980 *** ***
***
kkk kkk
***
1981
***
***
1982 ***
•kick
kkk
kkk kkk
This illustrates the poor temporal coverage of
Landsat data. Only the 1979 / 1980 growing season
offered any spread of images through one growing
season and even this is far from ideal. A notable gap
exists in the late June, early July period which
corresponds to the scenescence period of early
ripening crops and as such could be vital in
separating closely matched crops like winter wheat
and winter barley. The useable images were: 2nd
November 1979 and 18th February, 12th April, 18th
May, 4th June and 16th August, 1980. All are path
217, row 23 except the image from 4th June 1980 which
is path 216, row 24.
A fundamental pre requisite for the use of
multitemporal data is the ability to register the
imagery to a common projection, either image to
image, or image to map. This is neccessary for pixel
by pixel comparisons from one date to another. The
accuracy of any results derived from multitemporal
data sets are closely related to the accuracy of
registration of the original scenes, (Anderson,
1985), so much effort must be put into ensuring a
high degree of precision when transforming the
original imagery.
Correction of each scene was carried out using the
interactive geometric correction package on a GEMS
image processing system based on a PRIME 2250. This
involves the matching of image points with known
ground locations as found on 1:50,000 scale O.S. maps
and using the corresponding pairs of coordinates to
generate the coordinate transform equations.
Approximatly 20 control points in the vicinity of the
study area were used for each scene.
The transform equations for each of the 6 scenes, all
linear, were applied to the whole scenes with average
ground location errors being less than 100m for each
image. During the transformation each image was
resampled to give a 50m pixel, interpolation was
carried out using the Bilinear interpolation
algorithm.
A 1000 pixel by 600 line geometrically correct
subscene running from minimum easting, 603000,
minimum northing, 254000, to maximum easting, 653000,
maximum northing, 284000, was produced from each date
for the Framlingham test site. Cloud and haze in the
February and August images caused severe degradation
to the quality of these data. The June data suffered
from random noise which proved difficult to remove.
From examination of the band 4,5,&7 false colour
composites for each image a 512 pixel by 512 line
extract was defined to coincide with maximum ground
data availability and good image quality.
Ground data for each crop was matched to the imagery
by converting the easting and northing coordinates
for each field from the mapped ground data into X and
Y image coordinates. The classification proceedures
in the available software were then used to locate
each field and draw in a training area. The training
areas drawn for each field matched for all images.
This was possible for the November, February, April
and May scenes but the cloud and haze on the August
scene and the bad data of the June scene meant that
seperate training sets had to be established for
these two dates. Note however that no new areas were
introduced but that unsuitable areas were removed. In
all, 10 training sets were established, one for each
of the ten cover classes: winter wheat, winter
barley, spring barley, oilseed rape, sugar beet,
peas, beans, and coniferous and deciduous woodland, a
total area of 2000 Ha.
Where 24 bands of multitemporal Landsat data are
available for crop classification, as in this study,
the identification of the key bands for crop
discrimination becomes vital. This process was
accomplished through the use of a decision tree
applied to coincident spectral plots.
Mean pixel values and standard deviations for each of
the 10 cover types were extracted by using the
previously defined training areas. These data were
collected for all bands of all images and plotted as
coincident spectral plots, after Lindenlaub and
Davis, 1978.