502
Figure 4. Canal Perrin
Photo IGN 84 ANT 23200 341 Original 1:20000 reduced
to about 1:27000
1 Rhiz. bord de mer (fringe mangrove) ; 2 Rhiz.
thicket with Avic. 10 m ; 3 Semi deciduous forest
on limestone ; 4 Acrostichum ; 5 Tall Lagunc. around
3 ; 6 Pterocarpus ; 7 Low prairie ; 8 Avic. 7 to
10 m ; 9 Old canal colonized by mangrove ; 10 Cype-
raceae ; 11 Fire sweep in Cyperaceae ; 12 Saltflat
13 Cycloned Avic. + Lagunc. ; 14 Acrostichum thicket
15 Young Rhiz. + scattered Avic. or Lagunc. ;
16 Avic. thicket ; 17 Rhiz. thicket.
Figure 5. Lamentin - Grande Rivière à Goyaves (G.R.G.)
Photo IGN 63 ANT 036/200 159 Original 1:20000 reduced
to about 1:27000
1 Large Avic. ; 2 Avic. park-like : 3 Low prairie
on high bank ; 4 Pterocairpus ; 5 Cyperaceae (was
Pterocarpus before) ; 6 Chrysobalanus icaco thicket ;
7 Nephrolepis swamp ; 8 Canefields ; 9 Acrostichum
mixed with shrubs ; 10 Mixture Rhiz.-Avic.-Lagunc.
The rare species Avicennia schauerana occurs at
least in 5 sites in Guadeloupe : Le Moule, Fajou,
N.E. Rivière Salée, Baie Mahault and Port Louis.
It has been mentioned by Weiss on one site near
la Caravelle (Martinique), also by Beard (Grenada)
and Gooding (Barbados). Rhizophora harrisonii non
uncommon on the Venezuelan coasts has not yet been
spotted in the Lesser Antilles.
8. COMMENTS ON MAPPING CONSTRAINTS
The detailed legends of figures 2 to 7 give infor
mation about local (punctual) interpretation, mainly
on species identification, size of stands (height,
crown texture) and mixtures of species. Narrow tran
sects were cut in 1983 at random more or less perpen
dicular to the eastern shore of G.C.S. eastwards.
Transects 9 and 10 (Fig. 3) cut in dwarf Rhizophora
or low stands are well detectable, the photo being
taken soon afterwards (1984).
Transects are extremely convenient owing to the
possibility of a continuous description of vegetation
along with its stereoscopie image, yielding photo
patterns for comparison when the interpretation
would be otherwise dubious.
On the other hand geomorphology, inundation con
ditions, soils can be examined and described more
or less intensively according to the available time,
allowing checks about the gradients of various fac
tors : soil solution salinity at various depths,
Q soil texture, proportion of peat and clay...).
The wealth of details shown on panchromatic photos
(various tones and structures of canopies) has to
by reduced to a limited number of floristic-pedological
units in harmony with the magnitude of areas to
be mapped, scale of photos and final mapping scale.
A 1:50000 (or smaller) scale may be quite sufficient
to show landscapes and geomorphological units
(karst outcrops, beaches, dunes, high and low banks,
erosion or accretion zones...), large vegetation
units (mangrove, swampforest, open inundable
swamps...), broad soil groups (limestone, peat,
clay, calcic or non calcic deposits...).
A 1:10000 (or larger) scale is generally more
suitable for forest management maps showing in detail
the situation of the growing stock and growth condi
tions i.e. forest sites and fertility classes. The
trap to be avoided is to produce widely different
patterns by the soil scientist on one side, the
forester or botanist on the other side, barely raeca-
ningful to each other.
9. WETLAND MAPPING IN THE LESSER ANTILLES
Stehld (1945-46, 1947) described the vegetation
of the Lesser Antilles in many publications but
produced only sketchmaps at small scales between
1:300000 and 1:1200000. He regretfully introduced
in the literature the ambiguous terms of mangrove
maritime (for mangrove) and mangrove palustre (for
Pterocarpus swamp forest).