60
Table 2. Summary of regional/district-level crop forecasts during 1997-98 crop season under CAPE Project.
Crop
State
No. Districts
Area (‘000ha)
Production (‘000t)
Forecast Date
Rice(K)
Bihar
16
1744.32
2346.22
21/11/97
Rice (R)
Orissa
04
115.17
285.96
14/05/98
Mustard
Assam
04
55.10
25.90
18/02/98
Gujarat
02
241.38
270.39
05/03/98
Haryana
06
467.67
670.32
03/03/98
Rajasthan
06
793.33
804.04
05/03/98
West Bengal
02
105.60
89.20
18/02/98
Wheat
Bihar
29/ALL
1679.09/1982.86
3163.20/3731.51
19/03/98
Himachal Pradesh
05
241.54
360.21
02/04/98
Haryana
17
2022.88
7658.60
19/03/98
Madhya Pradesh
32/All
3726.83 / 4099.00
6691.90/7273.80
15/04/98
Punjab
17
3187.39
13174.89
19/03^98
Rajasthan
14/All
1379.57/2542.83
3452.39/6723.45
19/0J/98
Uttar Pradesh
51 /All
7986.11 /8792.14
19746.82/21305.60
02/04/98
Sorghum (R)
Maharshtra
06
2374.43
1307.33
02/04/98
Groundnut (R)
Orissa
02
19.64
27.28
19/03/98
CottonS
Gujarat
4 + (3)
802.74+ (396.16)
1667.43 + ( )#
18/02/98
Maharashtra
03
370.36
321.21
02/04/98
Rajasthan
01
267.50
#
24/11/97
$: Production in '000 bales; #: Acreage estimate only
Higher accuracy of acreage estimate with TM in
comparison to MSS has been noted for rabi sorghum in
Solapur in 1987-88 season (Potdar et al., 1991). Higher
inventory accuracy at village level for cotton has been
noted for LISS-I1 in comparison to LISS-I in Haryana
(Dutta et al., 1994). Singh et al., (1997) studied IRS LISS-
I (72.5 mtr), LISS-1I (36.5 mtr), LISS-III (23.5 mtr) and
WiFS (188 mtr) and have reported Kappa of 0.89, 0.88,
0.91 and 0.82 in wheat-gram area. The use of higher
spatial resolution can sometimes lead to lower
classification accuracy than moderate resolution especially
when training sites and locations are kept constant due to
increased variance of training sites (Dadhwal and Parihar,
1988; Medhavy et al., 1993). Markham and Townshend
(1981) have shown that two counteracting factors affect
classification accuracy as a function of spatial resolution.
With higher spatial resolution, spectral heterogeneity
increases leading to higher overlap between classes and
decreased classifi-cation accuracy but proportion of
boundary pixels reduces which leads to reduced
m ^classification. The final accuracy obtained is
‘dependent on relative importance of these two factors but
cannot be predicted since it is also dependent in a complex
way on relative location of categories within the feature
space’ (Markham and Townshend, 1981).
Inclusion of new spectral region having additional
information is useful in crop discrimination. Thus,
classification using MIR bands show higher crop
separability in wheat, gram and mustard growing region
(Dadhwal et al., 1989). Similar results have been obtained
for rice-other vegetation separation in Orissa (Panigrahy
and Parihar, 1992). Even in MIR region, better crop
discriminability using TM5 in comparison to TM7 has
been observed, which could be related to the higher within
crop variability in TM7 (Dadhwal et al., 1996).