families), (Wodicka et al, 1997; Lockhart et al.,
1996) doubled each synthetic oligonucleotide
(Perfect Match PM) to produce a new
oligonucleotide which is adjacent and identical
to the PM partner except for a single base in a
central position (MisMatch MM); the difference
between the PM signal and the MM signal
should give the constructive signal purified from
the noisy cross-hybridization signal. The same
aim was achieved by (Bernard et al., 1996) by
spotting four identical targets in two opposite
areas of the membrane to correct the intrafilter
variation.
The majority of the studies present in literature,
e.g. (Lockhart et al., 1996), provide a dynamic
range extending over three orders of magnitude
of the signal intensity.
The aim of the spot signal processing (filters,
Fourier transform, etc.) is to determine a
quantity which measures the expression level of
a particular target in a cell population (single
color mode) or the differential expression of a
particular target in two different cell populations
(dual-color mode). Therefore a wide, noisy and
variable spot signal must produce a unique
measurement, which may be analyzed
afterwards. Increase in target spacing reduces
overlapping among spot signals (and therefore a
part of the spot noise is eliminated), but at the
same time it reduces the numerousness in the
panel of targets.
(Wodicka et al., 1997), after discarding outlier
spots, averaged pixels inside the synthesis feature
rejecting the pixels lying in the proximity of
bounds. In this manner the authors reduced the
image to a simple text file containing for each
feature some information such as target position,
nucleotide sequence (if the sequence is known),
signal intensity, ratios between PM and MM
signals; this knowledge leads to the decision (by
means of statistical criteria based on calculating
the difference of a single-spot quantity from the
same quantity determined for the entire panel of
genes) of presence or absence of hybridization
for the feature.
The use of negative control genes could give the
possibility to measure the background noise,
since these genes should not hybridize and
should produce the only background noise
(Bernard et al., 1996).
By using internal control genes of known
expression level, the entire gene panel can be
determined at last.
5. IMAGE SIMULATOR
An image simulator has been developed in order
to study the fundamental image problems
without having to repeat, each time the
experimentation protocol and the reading step.
In this manner appropriate images can be
obtained, and by means of Fourier transform,
analysis of the signal components can be carried
out. These images can be subjected to statistical
and numerical filters and can be studied by using
mathematical functions. Usually the processing
time is very long due to the necessity of
adequate resolutions. The simulations of single
spots are repeated using different condition for
each single target. An object-oriented database is
used for storing spot images and relative
simulation parameters.
The generation process of the single spot is
simulated by means of the Monte Carlo (MC)
method. The deposition area of the genetic
material is thought as composed of countless
point-shaped sources, which are subjected to the
system PSF (Point Spread Function). The spot
area is uniformly sampled a given number of
times and each extracted sample becomes the
source which has to be transformed according to
the chosen PSF; the direct or rejection criterion
can determine the image pixels which the signal
reaches and the relative unitary increments
which contribute to the signal construction. The
simulation parameters are: image resolution, PSF
and its parameters, radius of the deposition area,
number (N) of samples of the deposition area,
number (M) of samples relative to the extracted
source and to the chosen PSF, adopted criterion
(direct or rejection criterion). N and M take into
account the different amounts of deposited
genetic material.
Figure 1 shows two examples of spot simulation
with normal PSF and unitary standard
deviation, with the same number of samples but
with two different deposition areas.
(a) (b)
Figure 1 - (a) deposition radius = 3, (b)
deposition radius = 2.