SOME CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT THE ANCIENT
PANORAMA OF LECCO (ITALY)
Some particular elements of the drawing, regarding the
knowledge of the area surveyed, are important to identify
the author. Furthermore analyzing the notes written on the
panorama of Lecco and taking into account some other
coincidences (Broglia et al., 1999), the authors arrived at
the conclusion that the architect Giuseppe Bovara was the
author. He realized the panorama from 1804 to 1816 and
it was found in the Carlini's documents, because there
was a big friendships between the astronomer and
Bovara.
In order to find the point(s) of view, some tops of
mountains and some places were recognized in the
panorama and compared, using a mathematical analysis,
with the measurements made on the Regional Technical
Map of Lombardy. The two sets of measurements were
compared using a least squares linear regression
between azimuth angles and linear distances; analogous
considerations were made for the elevation angles,
referred at the surface of the sea and compared to the
vertical distances measured on the panorama.
The correct localization of some points on the panorama
depends on the selection of the point station. The point of
view, considering the whole panorama, was firstly placed
in Lecco, near Belvedere Street, in proximity of the lake.
Successively observing the residuals of this first analysis
and their systematic behavior, the analysis was refined
considering the two parts of the drawing separately. Thus
two different points of view, which minimized the
mathematical solution, were found.
The first point of view, using only the first twenty points of
the section of the panorama with the Mont. Barro, was
situated in the cross-roads between Turati and Belvedere
Streets, at the altitude of about 220 m. on the sea level. It
is important to refer these considerations at the period, in
which the panorama was realized; therefore the historical
map, realized by IGM in the 1888, was used. In this map,
the main street of Lecco ran parallel at the Turati Street
and there were not houses among these streets and the
lake. So the visibility in this area toward the lake, in the
XIX century, was very large, this made possible the
presence of a point station to draw a panorama.
The second solution, referred to the second section of the
panorama with the Mont. St. Martino, obtained using
sixteen points, showed the point of view localized in the
center of gravity of a triangle. Its vertices were located: at
the Church of S. Nicolo (rebuild in the 1830 by the
architect Bovara, in more steps, with the bell-tower
finished in the 1904, on a Visconteo keep), at the
Canonica of the XVII century and at the house of Bovara
(now Municipal Library) (Dacco et al., 1988). Also this part
of the town of Lecco, in the XIX century, permitted a good
view of the lake and of the mountains around it.
COMPARISON WITH A MODERN TERRESTRIAL
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SURVEY
To validate the accuracy of the ancient panorama, i.e. the
capability of this old technique, to obtain a good altimetric
mapping, a modern terrestrial photogrammetric survey
was set up and compared. In January 1999, a
photogrammetric survey was organized using a metric
camera WILD P31, lens 100 mm, taking 6 images from
the bell - tower terrace of the St. Nicolo, the main church
in Lecco. The black and white images were digitized by
DTP scanner with low-resolution and then they were
mosaiched in a photogrammetric panorama by means of
commercial software (Figure 2).
To realize the comparison between the photogrammetric
panorama and the ancient one, in the set of points (listed
below), only twenty eight points were identified and
measured (Table 1). In fact, the correct identification of
the other nine points (shown in bold in the same list) were
not possible, on the photogrammetric panorama, for the
scarcity of either characteristics, or good and identifiable
elements, moreover for the presence of some occlusions
(Figure 3).
Figure 2. Modern terrestrial photogrammetric survey from Lecco (Italy)
Point number
Name on the
Map
Altitude on the
sea level (m)
1
Barro
889
2
657
3
Regina
817
4
Regina
814.7
5
448.2
6
Barro
922
7
Barro
850
8
Barro
830
9
800
10
585.8
11
Zucco in Boffalora
405.4
13
Valmadrera
240
14
Malgrate
220
15
Corno Birone
1116.2
17
Cornizzolo
1240
18
Rocca
272
19
Cima Rai
1215
20
Prasanto
1244.8
21
Pare
200
22
Canzo
1366
23
Cimone
1177.3
24
Cimone
1259
25
Cimone
1190
26
Cimone
1180.5
27
Cimone
1122.5