ISPRS, Vol.34, Part 2W2, “Dynamic and Multi-Dimensional GIS”, Bangkok, May 23-25, 2001
of experiment and verification, some basic rules and threshold
can be determined by experience. For example, a simple rule
could be: if this difference is distributed in more than 3 direction,
their frequency > F min „ change of building must took place in this
region. After these rules were decided, It was easy to detect the
existence and change of buildings for every region. Due to
limited space, the rules we adopted no longer listed here in
detail.
ft was simpler and easier to compare than the old one.
1 73: 12 1
7 : 103
83 : 63
263:57
90 180 270 360
(a) 35# region (new period)
7:32
83:39
90
263:12
180 270
360
(b) 35# region (old period)
Figure 6 four gradient direction histogram
3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
we experimented methods presented in this paper on two stereo
photo pairs of two different period of one urban area. All together
151 regions were extracted from the difference of DSMs. After
extending those candidate regions, some intersected regions
were combined and some very small regions were removed,
altogether 97 regions was regained for afterwards analysis.
Among 97 regions, for building, 41 regions are really changed,
56 regions really not changed, the gradient direction histogram
was
(a) epipolar Image of new period
(b) epipolar image of old period
Figure 7. Result of Change Detection
analyzed to determine really changed regions and change’s type.
Experiment result showed 31 changed regions to be detected
correctly and 41 not changed regions to be detected corrected.
The absolute accuracy of detecting according to formula
suggested by David (David, 1981 ) reached to (31+41)/97 = 73%.
Figure 7 shows a part of the result. The regions with white
boundary in top image window of figure 8 are changed, and the
regions with gray boundary are not changed.
4. CONCLUSIONS
The above analysis and processing were executed automatically
and did not need users’ intervention. Experiment’s method was
simple, easy to operate and meanwhile result of the experiment
was also encouraging.
Because of making use of both techniques of stereo image
analysis and single image analysis, the method presented in this
paper was more reliable and had a better performance than the
single image analysis. Of course the detection ratio is still low. To
raise the correct ratio of detection, there are a lot of problems to
solve.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks for the supporting from Natural Science Fund of
P R.China (No. 49771063).
References:
[1] Singh A., 1989, Digital change detection techniques using
remote sensing, Int, Remote Sensing, Vol. 10, No.6, 989-1003
[2] Fung, T, And E. Ledrew,1987, Application of Principal
components Analysis to Change Detection. Photogrammetric
Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol.53, No.12, p1649-1658
[3] Cushnie, Q., 1989, Monitoring urban land cover changes at
the urban fringe from SPOT HRV imagery in south-east England,
Int. Remote Sensing, Vol.10, No.6, 953-963.