683 
hich was, land 
: 10 : 10. 
on figure 9- 
ighest potential 
tential area is 
on for uranium 
ssion, the squ- 
result of the 
area. Most of 
tributed in the 
it can be sum- 
uation suggest 
nment for urani- 
non veget, 
larse-fine), 
¡mall linear 
¡ion 
?r the possible 
Lum deposit, 
sms are remained 
;, some part of 
s basement rock, 
;e phenomena and 
sly made clear 
be solved in the 
o other data, 
rospecting,boring 
124P E 
/ 
level of 
cks 
.on (a) and (b) 
123°E 124°E 
The higheat potential area 
Potential area 
Less potential area 
Zone of mining concession 
Figure 9- Evaluation map of potensial zone of uranium 
deposit 
REFERENCES 
Childers, M.O. 1974. Uranium occurence in upper Cre 
taceous and Tertiary strata of Wyoming and northern 
Colorado. Mountain geology Vol. 11, p. 131-147. 
Floyd, F.S. 1978. Remote sensing, Principles and pre- 
tation W.H.Freeman and company, San Francisco. 
Missallati, A. , Prelat, A.E. & Lyon, R.J.P. 1979* 
Simatlenious use of geological, geophysical, and 
Landsat digital data in uranium exploration. 
Remote sensing of environment 8 : 189-210. 
Smith, A.F. 1977. Interactive digital image process 
ing of Landsat data for geologic analysis. Pro 
ceedings of the international symposium on image 
processing, Interactions with photogrametry and 
remote sensing, Graz, p. 197-212. 
Vincent, R.K. 1977. Uranium exploration with computer 
-processed Landsat data. Geophysics Vol. 42, No. 3-