837
r applications,
on, natural
y and agricul-
. urbanization) ,
ion of other
reservoir and
lundering and
ffects.
of methodolo-
area of remote
variously
t (1984), Nor-
d are beyond
sents a sample
e cultural
t necessary
past . On a world-wide basis, economic development
and social progress invariably impacts on the cul
tural resource base as already indicated, and in the
developing nations these pressures are extreme to
the point where many potentially rich resources are
destroyed. Looting and wanton destruction are also
common in these countries, and they are problems that
still require some attention in the developed nations.
Against this background, a range of examples has
been selected pointing to various dimensions of
cultural resource remote sensing applications repre
senting a historic to prehistoric time span (Figs.
1-3).
4 THE CHALLENGES AHEAD
hown which is
vey. It becomes
ble scales for
and meso-scales,
al photography
re specialized
s not diminish
ta for use in
As with any developing sub-discipline in its youthful
stage, there are few established rules, and insuffi
cient time has elapsed for the "trickling down" of
advanced methods and techniques. Emerging from this
attempt to investigate some of the significant ele
ments in cultural resources remote sensing, we iden
tify the following challenges for the remote sensing
community:
ready exists at
lly every area
cance covered,
mbracing a time
archives at
ith data, but
n both quantity
most applicable
eveloping world,
atellite cove-
ough there are
e disparities
methodological
t to more costly
ty to acquire
st resort to
her purpose.
, semi-recent
ges in the
nd the world
and deserve
stigators should
natives to con-
cently been
literature,
rs, 1985),
n, 1985, Holm
1. The first and foremost challenge involves the
training and education of personnel, not only in the
area strictly concerned with cultural resources, but
in cognate areas in the geo-sciences and bio-sciences.
Just recently, the American Anthropological Associa
tion provided a special session on remote sensing
applications at its annual meeting, and at the Uni
versity of Vermont, a course on "Remote Sensing of
Past Landscapes", was offered for the first time with
considerable interest on the part of graduate students
from geography, archaeology, history and historical
preservation. Workshops, seminars, and courses at the
University level need to be developed. A mechanism to
promote education in this field may be possible
through international means, as for example through
the United Nations University. If any progress is to
be made in this area, it must start with increasing
the number of enlightened scientists, resource mana
gers and educators. Developing and incorporating
teaching units that could fit into existing courses
in geography, history, archaeology, ecology, civil
engineering and geo and bio-sciences would go a Ion
way toward increasing awareness and could serve to
feed in-depth courses. Cleere (1984) also stresses
the importance of the educational process ranging
down to the elementary school level and the incor
poration of such topics within the context of the
traditional school subjects of geography and history.
1 basis for
r s: 'all cultural
es, that have
y cultural
value or use
implies that a
ed survey and
e (1984), sum-
:ource manage-
in twelve coun
ground survey
■ations. Another
>y scholars is
;-standing and
m sites,
more diffuse
idscape at large
itent of the
_s site-oriented
■gely through the
md the emergence
> studying the
2. A second challenge focuses on facilitating survey
work at all appropriate scales through providing
easier access to the imagery inventory. The major
detective work required to locate imagery often dis
courages application attempts. Many archaeological
and historic preservation agencies do not use imagery
of any kind, and where used, it may only be applied
as a field tool after which it is forgotten. Large
scale orthophoto maps, which are increasingly being
produced make excellent bases for inventorizing cul
tural resources and for comparative work with other
remote sensing imagery, including findings from high
altitude or satellite. In all countries there is a
need to find a way of declassifying the storehouses
of obsolete, now unused imagery acquired by various
military establishments. A system of reporting new
image acquisition in the civil realm, such as the
international effort used to report radiocarbon
dating, would be extremely useful and might be possi
ble under the auspices of an organization such as
ISPRS.
3. A third challenge focuses on the area of increasing
interdisciplinary and interagency cooperation and the
removal of barriers between the several disciplines
that overlap in this field to circumvent duplication
and conflict. Remote sensing can serve as the tie
that binds. It would seem appropriate that remote
sensing experts should take every opportunity to
communicate findings that have potential value in
the cultural resources field whatever their
discipline. Multi-disciplinary resource inventory
and management projects offer the benefits of a more
comprehensive view and should be encouraged.
4. Increasing public awareness and support has been
identified by Cleere (1984) and Riechstein (1984) as
a critical element in the management process. This
is no less true regarding remote sensing applica
tions. The treatment in the American magazine News
week cited at the outset is indeed an extremely rare
event. Media attention is critical and is much more
prevalent in Europe than in the United States.
Items worthy of public notice found during remote
sensing data analysis can be called to the attention
of the mass media with the cooperation of appropriate
management authorities. Making contacts with local
authorities and historical and archaeological clubs
is another fruitful approach.
5. The involvement of remote sensing in the manage
ment of cultural resources offers a fifth challenge.
The numerous aspects of managing such resources has
been outlined by Riechstein (1984) and at least two-
thirds of the 46 listed threats to cultural resources
can be monitored by remote sensing means. Staff and
funding limitations are a problem so the solution is
not simple. Again education plays a role, perhaps
involving government officials. In the land-use
planning, process inclusion of cultural resources
cannot be too strongly emphasized (Cleere, 1984) .
Countries such as Denmark and Sweden and several
other countries of Northern Europe have advanced
significantly in this area, while in the developing
countries, the landscape is likely to be sacrificed
for the immediate economic result with considerable
loss of cultural resources.
6. The sixth challenge rests with the rapidly deve
loping geographic information system (GIS) approach
to resource management and planning in which remote
sensing inputs play an increasingly significant role.
Its application offers a valuable aid in delimiting
cultural landscapes. GIS, with the inclusion of
remote sensing data provides a means of assessing
land-use change which is one of the major factors
affecting cultural resources. The application of the
GIS approach, although gaining in use, lacks wide
spread implementation in which cultural resources
are an element. Denmark, along with other Northern
European countries have made important strides in
this direction by digitizing various levels of land
scape information including their register of monu
ments and sites. Aerial imagery is employed in many
aspects of their work. An interesting example involves
route planning for a major pipeline system in Denmark
involving some 2000 km. of right-of-way (Kristiansen,
1984). Using a GIS approach it was possible to plan
a route of least destruction.
7. The research challenge cannot be stressed too
strongly. Although multi-spectral studies regarding
the detectability of certain cultural resources are
developing in the United States, Canada, a few Euro
pean countries and in scattered locales elsewhere,
as for example in the Costa Rican case under
American auspices mentioned at the outset, there is
a critical need for research that would point to some
predictable results. Links between university research