Full text: Remote sensing for resources development and environmental management (Volume 2)

943 
Table 1. Coding, area estimates and percentage of occurrance of soil associations 
and Lake Michigan in Indiana. 
Soil associations 
Map symbol 
Code 
Area in Ha 
Percentage 
Genesse-Eel-Shoals 
Al 
1 
202,050 
2.13 
Fox-Genesse-Eel 
A2 
2 
187,825 
1.98 
31oan-Ross-Vincennes-Zipp 
A3 
3 
44,225 
0.47 
Stendal-Haymond-Wakeland-Nolin 
A4 
4 
400,000 
4.23 
Wheeling-Huntington-Lindside 
A5 
5 
65,800 
0.69 
Houghton-Adrian 
B1 
6 
70,600 
0.74 
Maumee-Gilford-Sebewa 
B2 
7 
333,350 
3.51 
Rensselaer-Darroch-Whitaker 
Cl 
8 
131,450 
1.39 
Sebewa-Gilford-Homer 
C2 
9 
30,150 
0.32 
Lyles-Ayrshire-Princeton 
C3 
10 
15,600 
0.16 
Milford-Bono-Rensselaer 
D1 
11 
23,900 
0.25 
Patton-Lyles-Henshaw 
D2 
12 
51,350 
0.54 
Zipp-Markland-McGary 
D3 
13 
38,275 
0.40 
Tracy-Door-Lydick 
El 
14 
91,475 
0.96 
Elston-Shipshe-Warsaw 
E2 
15 
77,325 
0.82 
Oshtemo-Fox 
E3 
16 
219,100 
2.31 
Fox-Ockley-Westland 
E4 
17 
208,825 
2.20 
Parke-Negley 
E5 
18 
22,175 
0.23 
Oakville-Adrian 
FI 
19 
19,450 
0.21 
Plainfield-Maumee-Oshtemo 
F2 
20 
198,475 
2.09 
Princeton-Bloomfield-Ayrshire 
G 
21 
98,100 
1.03 
Alford 
H 
22 
173,350 
1.83 
Ragsdale-Raub 
11 
23 
45,225 
0.48 
Sable-Ipava 
12 
24 
17,300 
0.18 
Fincastle-Ragsdale 
13 
25 
273,700 
2.88 
Reesville-Ragsdale 
14 
26 
99,050 
1.04 
Iva-Vigo 
15 
27 
62,200 
0.66 
Brookston-Odell-Corwin 
J1 
28 
155,300 
1.64 
Crosier-Brookston 
J2 
29 
135,300 
1.43 
Crosby-Brookston 
J3 
30 
703,050 
7.41 
Blount-Pewamo 
K1 
31 
517,925 
5.46 
Hoytville-Nappanee 
K2 
32 
28,375 
0.30 
Parr-Brookston 
LI 
33 
102,700 
1.08 
Riddles-Tracy-Chelsea 
L2 
34 
'13,500 
0.14 
Miami-Crosier-Brookston-Riddles 
L3 
35 
387,700 
4.09 
Miami-Crosby-Brookston 
L4 
36 
493,400 
5.20 
Miami-Hennepin-Crosby 
L5 
37 
72,475 
0.76 
Miami-Russell-Fincastle-Ragsdale 
L6 
38 
490,425 
5.17 
Russell-Hennepin-Fincastle 
L7 
39 
67,700 
0.71 
Markham-Elliott-Pewamo 
Ml 
40 
42,950 
0.45 
Morley-Blount-Pewamo 
M2 
41 
636,825 
6.71 
Bartle-Peoga-Dubois 
N1 
42 
72,000 
0.76 
Weinbach-Wheeling 
N2 
43 
43,325 
0.46 
Avonburg-Clermont 
N3 
44 
135,850 
1.43 
Hosmer 
01 
45 
152,575 
1.61 
Zanesville-Wellston-Tilsit 
02 
46 
125,100 
1.32 
Cincinnati-Vigo-Ava 
03 
47 
246,575 
2.60 
Cincinnati-Rossmoyne 
04 
48 
383,950 
4.05 
Wellston-Zanesville-Berks 
P 
49 
461,950 
4.87 
Crider-Bedford-Lawrence 
Ql 
50 
25,675 
0.27 
Crider-Hagerstown-Bedford 
Q2 
51 
284,925 
3.00 
Crider-Baxter-Corydon 
Q3 
52 
63,125 
0.67 
Berks-Gilpin-Weikert 
R1 
53 
185,675 
1.96 
Corydon-Weikert-Berks 
R2 
54 
56,725 
0.60 
Eden-Switzerland 
R3 
55 
138,525 
1.46 
Lake Michigan 
60 
62,500 
0.66 
Table 2. Area estimates and percentage 
of potential erosion classes in Indiana. 
Table 3. Area estimates and 
of dominant relief classes in 
porcentage 
Indiana. 
Classes 
Hectares 
Percent 
Classes 
Hectares 
Percent 
Very high 
865,050 
9.1 
Hilly 
906,000 
9.5 
High 
2,085,875 
22.0 
Rolling 
3,736,850 
39.4 
Medium 
2,223,050 
23.4 
Undulating 
592,275 
6.2 
Low 
4,250,850 
44.8 
Nearly level 
4,189,700 
44.2 
Lake Michigan 
62,500 
0.7 
Lake Michigan 
62,500 
0.7
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.