1036
15m
Table 1. Specif
scatterometer
Ad/sin0
Figure 6. Relation be
tween range resolution
Ad and ground resolution.
tion in general have to be supplemented.by physical
parameters which can only be determined experimen
tally. Before discussing some examples in section 4
the experimental techniques will be described first.
In general the required information is collected by
radar systems of special design, the so-called scat-
terometers. The underlying principles are basically
the same as those used in radar. The first system to be
mentioned is based on the well-known pulse-modulation
principle. A pulse-modulated radar system measures
distances by measuring the time interval t between a
transmitted pulse and its echo. Since the signal trav
els two times the distance d between the radar and
the (point) target we have d=ct/2, where c is the
velocity of light. Two targets which lie in the same
direction as seen from the radar can only be detected
separately when their echos have at least a separation
At= T where T is the pulse duration. From this it
follows that the distance resolution:
Ad = cAt/2 = ct/2. (5)
To handle a pulse of duration X the system needs
a bandwidth B = 1/x and therefore we may as well
write:
Ad = c/2B (6)
To relate the point target resolution to that for
extended targets like in remote sensing we conclude
from fig. 6 that a distance Ad in the direction of
pulse propagation corresponds with a distance Ad/sin9
along the ground.
This ground distance can be identified as one of the
two dimensions of the resolution cell. The other
dimension perpendicular to the one first found fol
lows from the antenna beam width.
The second radar principle to be introduced here
is the FM-CW principle where FM stands for frequency
modulation and CW for continious wave. In the FM-CW
scatterometer the transmitter is swept periodically
over a frequency band B e.g. by means of a sawtooth
wave (fig. 7) while the amplitude is kept constant.
The transmitted frequency is in the figure indicated
by the solid line. With distance d between radar and
target the reflected signal will again be delayed by
Figure 8. Configuration for test plot measurements
Figure 9. Fluctuations of the
radar backscattering when a
scatterometer moves along test
plots.
time t=2d/c. The frequency of this echo signal is
given by the dotted line. In the receiver the instan
taneous frequency difference between the two signals
is generated and from this so-called beat frequency
the distance can be calculated. It can be shown (Krul
1981) that the distance resolution for the FM-CW
radar also follows from eq.(6).
Finally we should mention the radars taking advan
tage of the so-called Doppler shift appearing when
the target and the radar have a relative velocity.
When a target is moving towards the radar with a con
stant velocity v m/s there will exist a frequency
difference 2v/A between the transmitted and the re
ceived signals. This frequency difference is called
the Doppler frequency. The use of a Doppler scattero
meter for extended target measurements requires spe
cial measures to ensure proper resolution cells.
Having ontlined briefly the principles used for
scatterometry in relation to extended targets, we
will describe the instruments developed for the re
mote sensing program in The Netherlands.
As was pointed out already in the introduction it
was decided in 1973 to start the development of a
scatterometer at 3 cm wavelength. The system was
operated according to the FM-CW principle and was
mounted on a 10m mobile elevator. The basic idea
was that during the measurements the carriage was
moving on rails along a series of test plots (fig. 8).
During its travel the receiver output signal was re
corded continuously . A sample of such a recording is
reproduced in fig. 9, it clearly shows the different
mean levels associated with the different crop types,
on the test plots.
For subsequent travels in general different inci
dence angles and/or polarization states were chosen.
The 3 cm scatterometer, the characteristics of which
are summarized in table 1, was used (with slight modi
fications) for crop measurements up to and including
the growing season of 1981. Since it was to be expec-
Frequency
Frequency sweep
Modulation wave
Modulation freq
Output power
polarization
incidence angle
Range
Antenna
Recording
Table 2. Speci
based scatterom
Frequency
Frequency sweep
Modulation wave
Modulation freqi
Output power
Polarization
Incidence angle
Range
Antenna
Recording
Table 3. Specif
airborne scatte
Frequencies
Modulation type
Pulse rep. freq
Pulse’width
Output power
Polarization
Incidence angle
Range
Antenna
Data acquisitic
ted that the ra
only depends on
of the electron:
cy it seemed in
quency. For a n
chosen in the 8
The specifics
table 2. Only d
1981 this 8mm s
tic. measurement
Although the
to be very usef
microwaves by v
the first place
very limited, t
the a°-values f
type (ecologica
ondly the illun
groundbased mea
small, which sc
scatter values
systems. In the
difficult to bu
uencies mainly
straints. Final
most by definit