Leaf _ Cell
pigments; structure ; Water content
h Dominant factor
v controlling leaf
J reflectance
Table 1. Spectral bandwidths (in microns) of some
satellite systems commonly used for vegetation
surveyance.
" c -o ; Near infrared I Middle infrared
5 £ *
O
'i Primary
v absorption
J bands
I Spectral
[ region
Figure 1. Typical reflectance curve of green vegeta
tion (from Hoffer 1978).
1 The thermal sensors have usually much coarser
resolution than the ones in visible and NIR. So far
the best spaceborne resolution is offered by the
Landsat TM channel 6, wich is 120 m, compared to 30
m in the other bands. According to Lynn (1986)
there are no plans, so far, for launching
satellites equipped with thermal IR sensors with a
resolution better than_2 km.
2 The measured radiating temperature is a mixture of
vegetation and soil temperature. Due to the dynamic
nature of temperature it is practically impossible
to get data on soil temperature other than for
limited experiments. It is therefore difficult to
separate the influence from vegetation on the
emitted thermal radiation.
3 The emissivity of a vegetation canopy and soil
surface varies with the water content, which in
turn is very variable in time and space.
Landsat
MSS
Band 4
0.5
-
0.6
Band 5
0.6
-
0.7
Band 6
0.7
-
0.8
Band 7
0.8
-
1.1
Landsat
TM
Band 1
0.45
-
0.52
Band 2
0.52
-
0.60
Band 3
0.63
-
0.69
Band 4
0.76
-
0.90
Band 5
1.55
-
1.75
Band 6
10.4
-
12.5
Band 7
2.08
-
2.35
SPOT
Band 1
0.50
-
0.59
Band 2
0.61
-
0.69
Band 3
0.79
-
0.89
Panchromatic
0.51
-
0.73
TIROS-N
AVHRR
Band 1
0.55
-
0.90
Band 2
0.725
-
1.10
Band 3
3.55
-
3.93
Band 4
10.5
-
11.50
NOAA 6-
7 AVHRR
Band 1
0.58
-
0.68
Band 2
0.725
-
1.10
Band 3
3.55
-
3.93
Band 4
10.5
-
11.5
Band 5
11.5
-
12.5
* = NOAA 7 only.
2.3 Microwave radiation
The microwave radiation of interest to remote sensing
is usually restricted to 5-500 mm and the most common
sensing systems working in this band are radar
instruments. A radar system is not necessarily rest
ricted to work in the microwave region, though most
of them do.
Radar is an example of an active technique, where
the radiation is transmitted, towards the surface of
the earth, by the instrument. The returning radiation
is then measured concerning the time lapse since
transmittance and properties of the returning signal.
Two characteristics of the surface being sensed are
important, surface roughness and conductivity. This
means that radar imagery can provide information on
vegetation type (e.g. Bush & Ulaby 1978, Shanmugam
et.al. 1983) as well as on vegetation conditions
(e.g. Ulaby et.al 1984, Paloscia & Pampaloni 1984).
So far, most of the experiences from spaceborne
radar imagery come from Seasat in 1978. Although
primarily intended for surveying the oceans many
investigations over land surfaces were carried out.
In Canada, the very high cloud frequency contri
buted to the development of radar instrumentation for
remote sensing purposes. Cihlar et.al. (1986)
summarizes the Canadian experiences concerning micro-
wave remote sensing of agricultural crops, during the
last 10 years. A general conclusion is that, although
it is difficult to establish consistent mathematical
relationships based on the present knowledge, crop
classification as well as canopy and soil parameters
can be studied successfully under certain conditions,
Table 2. The relationship between multispectral
reflectance and vegetation amount for five wavelength
bands for a grass canopy. Source: Curran 1980, Tucker
& Maxwell 1976.
Waveband
Waveband
width (nm)
Characteristics
Relationship to
vegetation amount
1 Ultraviolet/blue
350-500
Strong chlorophyll
and carotenoid
absorption
Strong negative
2 Green
500-600
Reduced level of
pigment absorption
Weak positive
3 Orange/red
600-700
Strong chlorophyll
absorption
Strong negative
4 Far red
700-740
Transition between
strong absorbance
(3) and strong
reflectance (5)
Weak negative
5 Near infrared
740-800
High vegetation
reflectance
Strong positive
the data obtained by visible and near infrared
sensors.
3. SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING, DATA CONSIDERATIONS
Remote sensing from space-borne platforms has been an
area of intensive research the last two decades, and
computerized analysis of remotely sensed data has
been common for more than ten years. Both techniques
and equipment for analysis of the data as well as for
capture of tl
rapid developr
the launch of
remote sensinc
resource invenl
more importanl
the introducl
resolution has
bands has ino
volumes have
consequent of
the demands on
the gap betw<
widened.
Table 3. Spat:
as Landsat MSS
most commonly •
Sensing system
Landsat MSS
Landsat TM
Spot (multispe
Spot (panchrom
NOAA 6 and 7 A
* Local area c
In spite of th
and feasibili
tional applica
major constra
tively long i
chances of obt
region at a c
small. Justic
or two scenes
launch of the
parts of West
worse over t
this problem 1
weather sate11
recordings (He
et. al. 198S
parisons betwe
carried out,
information c
Townshend &
represented e
bands 5 and 7
The ability
satellite wi]
solve some c
repeat cycle
using the ofi
average repee
maximum 5 days
The use of
views, e.g. N(
however sevet
mainly from tl
1 Varying ati
length
2 Vegetation
properties,
3 The topogr;
pronounced
4 Distorted p:
A comprehe:
on SPOT and
Cracknell (l 1
authors have
(NOAA AVHRR).