called GPS-supported aerotriangulation. The early
simulation experiments indicated that accurate
aerotriangulation may be achievable without ground
control points if GPS-determined camera positions reach
the order of submeter accuracy in each coordinate [Lucas,
1987]. Current investigations show that it is possible to
reduce remarkably the number of essential ground control
points in photogrammetric block adjustment to 4 points
around the four comers of a block area [Yuan and Li,
1997]. Moreover, in conventional bundle adjustment, the
optimal accuracy requires full ground control points
around the perimeter of the area at intervals of two
airbases and elevation control points at intervals of four
airbases in the center of the area. Consequently, GPS-
supported aerotriangulation will avoid hard field survey
for determining ground control points and especially
provides a topographic map of inaccessible regions of the
Earth, which will lead to a small technological revolution
in photogrammetry and establish a foundation for fully
automatic analytical photogrammetry.
The research of GPS-supported aerotriangulation was
started in 1984. The scholars in the USA, Germany, the
Netherlands and Finland have made a lot of
investigations since 1986. In early 1990’s, Chinese
surveyors went in for this scientific research, too. Up to
now, almost ten actual photo flight missions with airborne
GPS receiver were performed in different parts of China,
which achieved expected results. At present the complete
GPS satellites constellation ensures that a receiver is
simultaneously able to observe the GPS signals of four or
more satellites anywhere on the Earth at any time.
Therefore, we may say that GPS-supported
aerotriangulation is now ready for practical application.
This paper first derives the mathematical model of
combined bundle block adjustment with airborne GPS
data, and then outline the basic functions and structure of
our developed combined adjustment software
WuCAPS G ps. Finally, a set of actual experiments based
on GPS-controlled photogrammetric flights over five
sites in China are presented and discussed.
2. MATHEMATICAL MODEL
observations and GPS-determined data of the camera
stations consists of kinematic GPS relative positioning
and combined bundle adjustment with GPS navigation
data. The intention of this paper is to detail the later. Of
course, the adjustment methodology also deals with a lot
of other technical details of data processing, which were
previously described by Yuan et al.[Yuan, 1995, 1996,
1997].
2.1 A Strict Relationship Between Camera
Perspective Center and GPS Antenna Phase
Center
As far as the kinematic GPS relative positioning, we can
get 3D coordinates of the phase center of airborne GPS
antenna mounted on the fuselage at each GPS observation
epoch. However, the 3D coordinates of the camera
perspective centers are only solved by a bundle
adjustment. Unfortunately, in a conventional installation,
the phase center of the GPS antenna and the rear nodal of
aerial camera lens cannot occupy the same point in space.
It causes a separation problem between camera and
antenna. Let (X A , Y A , Z A ) and (X s , Y s , Z s ) be the
geodetic positions to the phase center of the GPS antenna
and the perspective center of the aerial camera,
respectively, as shown Figure 1. If the antenna offset in
camera coordinate system is (u, v, w), then the
transformation is accomplished with orientation matrix R.
Fig. 1 Relative positions between camera and antenna
If a GPS receiver on board the moving aircraft and
another fixed receiver on the ground reference point can
simultaneously record the successive signals of four or
more GPS satellites at a measuring rate of 1 second or
shorter during photo flight missions, the camera station
positions at exposure time can be accurately determined
by using the differential GPS carrier phase observations
in Kalman filter. When the 3D coordinates of these
camera stations are introduced into the bundle adjustment
procedure to solve altogether the orientation parameters
of aerial photographs and 3D coordinates of
photogrammetric points, a GPS-supported bundle block
adjustment is formed. In other words, the procedure of
the combined bundle adjustment for photogrammetric
X
>
1
X'
u
Y A
=
Y s
+ R •
V
1
N
>
1
N
C/>
1
w
Friess has reported that the kinematic GPS relative
positioning may cause a systematic drift error which is
linear proportion to the flight duration t during photo
flight mission [Friess, 1991]. Taking account of
correcting model of the linear systematic error, equation
1 can be written as