In: Wagner W„ Székely, B. (eds.): ISPRS TC VII Symposium - 100 Years ISPRS, Vienna, Austria, July 5-7, 2010, IAPRS, Vol. XXXVIII, Part 7B
393
ellipse of Figure 6, even the results shown in Figures 6 and 7
would not be affected either.
6. SPATIAL REGULARIZATION
In order to improve the quality of the obtained output, we test
here the usefulness of applying a spatial regularization
technique as well. Again, in order to test the principle itself, we
use a simple spatial regularization method: majority voting
within a sliding window. Applying this method to the image
shown in Figure 11, we obtain the result presented in Figure 12.
Figure 12. Result of spatial regularization applied to Figure 11
Although spatial régularisation does not affect the method itself
either, it improves the quality of the final result by removing
isolated points thus clearing the image and emphasizing the
detected areas, as can be seen by comparing Figures 6 and 13,
i.e., Figures 7 and 14.
Figure 13. Same as Figure 6, but obtained after applying spatial
regularization to the starting images. Region within the blue
ellipse is zoomed in Figure 14
Figure 14. Zoom of the region within the blue ellipse in Fig. 13
7. VALIDATION
Results presented here indicate that there is a region where
human activities might have been performed, with changes in
coherence values corresponding to works in building a hard
surface on a sand terrain, and that these activities appear mainly
in two parallel stripes as well as around them.
A newspaper article from February 2008 (Greenberg, 2008)
makes it possible to validate the obtained results. This article
speaks about works at this same airfield, mentioning that a new
runway is being built, together with other operational buildings
around the runway, and that the works are about to be finished.
The article also shows aerial photos which correspond to the
region extracted by our analysis (Fig. 14). This means that our
results are in a complete concordance with the reality, showing
that the approach presented in this paper is promising for
detecting human activities.
8. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
A simple method to detect potential human activities using
CCD technique in repeat-pass SAR imagery is presented here.
The results are validated, showing that the method is promising
in extracting zones where a potential temporal change in the
human activities occur, such as works in building-up areas of
hard surface. As a good study case for a first research step, a
desert type of soil is analyzed. Terrains which represent more
difficult situations from the point of view of CCD technique
will be studied in a next step.
The presented method does not need any specific knowledge
sources. Nevertheless, we show in this paper that if knowledge
sources exist, it is possible to include them in order to improve
final results. These knowledge sources can be related to the
sensors, such as their operational principles, or to the situation
at hand, referring to the context - terrain type, land-use,
historical background etc. Three types of knowledge sources
(information on the area of interest, pedologically extracted
robustness and slope extracted from the digital elevation model)
are included in the obtained results as an illustration. In a next
step, possibilities of including some other knowledge sources,
such as geological maps or aerial photos will be studied.
In addition, in order to improve the aspect of the final result, the
application of a spatial regularization method is tested, showing
that it might be useful to further analyze ways to remove
artefacts and preserve only the useful information.
Finally, in future work, fusion of the obtained results with data
coming from other sensors in order to further improve the
quality and the robustness of the results will be investigated.
REFERENCES
Fanelli, A. et al., 2000. Understanding ERS Coherence over
Urban Areas. In: ESA-SP-461 (Ed.), ERS-Envisat Symposium,
Gothenburg, Sweden.
Greenberg, H., 2008. “Longest landing field in Middle East to
be constructed in Nevatim”.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3508174,00.html
(accessed 30 May 2010)
Lu, D. et al., 2004. Change detection techniques. International
Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(12), pp. 2365-2407.