The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part Bl. Beijing 2008
good data sources for DTM automatic generation and accuracy
analysis. With the cooperation of several Institute of Surveying
and Mapping in Shanxi, Heilongjiang and Sichuan, about 157
well-distributed GCPs were collected with differential GPS in
2006. The measurement accuracy was better than lm in
planimetry and 1.2m in height. With aids of these GCPs,
block-adjustment was made and the orientation accuracy is
about 5m in planimetry and 2m in height.
Fig. 4: Shaded DTM of the whole test-field in zone of
headstream of Three Rivers, the DTM is automatically
generated from 11 SPOT-5 HRS and nearly 20 HRG images.
White areas (holes in DTM) are cloud-covered areas. White
boxes show that coverage of 2 SPOT-5 HRS images, which
used for DTM accuracy study.
After the block-adjustment, the proposed DTM generation
approach was applied to 2 SPOT HRS stereo image strips and 6
HRG images simultaneously. As a result, 25m grid-spacing
DTM of the accuracy study area has been generated
automatically after about 26 hour. As results, about 90 millions
feature points and 5 millions feature lines have been matched
which is equivalent to match a 4 x 4 density grid on the original
image, and it is good enough for generation of DTM with 25m
interval. Since our DTM generation approach not only generates
a large number of mass points but also produces line features,
which are necessary for the modeling the rugged mountainous
terrain. Parts of DTM results are shown in Fig 5. It can be seen
that the resulted DTM reproduced quite well not only the general
features of the terrain relief but also small géomorphologie and
other features visible in the SPOT-5 images.
Since the study area is within the WChTM project covered area,
there are not good enough reference data. Therefore we apply
the following three accuracy evaluation methods for DTM
accuracy evaluation:
(1) Overlay the automated generated DTM onto stereo image
pairs to apply the manual visual checking under stereoscopic
display device. Checking results show a good enough match
between DTM and stereo images expect some small blunders
within shadow areas, which have to apply necessary manual
editing.
(2) Accuracy checking by using GCPs and check points
measured by differential GPS. Upside of Table 1 give the DTM
accuracy evaluation results by using this method. We computed
the differences as GCPs minus the interpolated heights from our
generated DTM. The accuracy of the DTM is between 1.7 - 6.7
m depending on the terrain relief and land cover. With this
method, the errors probably include influence of all three error
(a): Shaded DTM of arid/semi-arid mountainous terrain.
(c): Shaded DTM of high-plateau mountain ranges
Fig. 5: The shaded terrain models of 25m over 3 sub-areas
in Zone of headstream of Three rivers, Tibet Plateau,
China. The resulting DTM reproduced quite well not only
the general features of the terrain relief but also small
géomorphologie and other features visible in the images.
Results show that it very necessary to use the multiply
image matching and edge matching with SPOT-5
HRS/HRG images over rough and steep mountainous areas.
(3) Accuracy checking by using manually measured checking
points which were acquired on digital photogrammetric