The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part Bl. Beijing 2008
need for UAS has outweighed the lack of reliability. Therefore,
generally speaking, UAS technology requires improvements to
be made to its reliability. Obvious issues are the vulnerability
of GPS-based navigation technology, the need for reliable data
links and the predominant use of a single engine. The use of
GPS as the sole means of navigation is, certainly, an issue.
However, wide area augmentation services of GPS and of the
coming Galileo system, the Safety of Life (SoL) service of
Galileo, and their hybridization with redundant IMU
configurations, barometric altimeters and magnetometers will
provide a sufficient degree of navigational integrity (section
4.1). Reliable data links, particularly for long range UAS, can
be based on satellite communications. Single engine
configurations can be replaced by double engine ones —or
equivalent redundant configurations— such that the UA be
able to fly on one of the two engines. It goes without saying
that higher reliability can easily translate into more weight and
power consumption.
Integration in the civilian airspace. Currently there are many
initiatives, projects, professional associations and government
agencies dealing with the integration of UAs in the regulated
civilian airspace. At the international level, the International
Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has created the Unmanned
Aircraft Systems Study Group (UASSG) with, among others,
the purpose of developing a regulatory concept for UASs. The
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has been active in
the topic for years, mainly in the operation of military UASs in
the non segregated air space. It has or is about to produce
standards on standard interfaces, on airworthiness requirements,
on Aerial Traffic Management (ATM) and others. In Europe,
the European Commission’s (EC) regulatory agency, the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the European
Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
(EUROCONTROL) have to be mentioned. EASA is currently
working on the UAS certification policy and
EUROCONTROL does it on the integration of both military
and civilian UASs in the non-segregated airspace. Also in
Europe, the Working Group 73 “Unmanned Aircraft Systems”
of the European Association for Civil Aviation Equipment
(EUROCAE) elaborates materials to support that unmanned
aircraft can operate safely within non-segregated airspace in a
manner compatible with other airspace users. In the US, the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), in addition to several
regulations has created the Unmanned Aircraft Program Office
(UAPO) whose goal is to regulate the operation of UASs in the
non-segregated airspace no later than 2011. (The Department
of Defense (DoD) and the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) are active in this field since many
years.) Also in the US, Committee F38 of ASTM International,
one of the largest voluntary standards development
organization, has produced UAS standards, ranging from
airworthiness, to terminology, to sense-and-avoid
specifications. Last not least, the Japan UAV Association
(JUAV) has established standards for the commercial use of
UASs in non populated areas since 2004.
Common treats in the above mentioned initiatives are that an
UAS shall satisfy national and/or international airworthiness
criteria; that it shall be able to respond to ground-to-air and air-
to-air voice communications; that it shall support a sense-and-
avoid capability with respect to other aircraft, equivalent to that
of a piloted plane and that it some procedures and maneuvers
shall be automated.
Social acceptance and safety reputation. Damage caused by a
flying vehicle depends on a number of factors like its kinetic
energy (related to weight and speed) and its engine
(combustion or electric). UA crashes are far less damaging than
their manned counterparts but may be more frequent. Repeated
successful flights over populated areas will pave the way for
social acceptance of UAS operations while a few accidents will
do a long lasting reputational damage. In the last years there
have been successful experiences like the July 2004 historic
flight over Amsterdam but also tragic accidents like the
October 2006 Kinshasa crash where two people were killed
and two other suffered from bums. The degree of social
acceptance of UAS will ultimately depend on the popular
combined perception of safeness and usefulness of UAS
operations. And to this point, it is probably more than cost
effective mapping that may count; support to search and rescue
operations of people lost in the wilderness or adrift at sea are
the kind of applications likely to generate the required empathy.
5.2 The immediate future
The discussed challenges notwithstanding, there are market
niches that are an opportunity for actual business and further
technology development and testing. Today, there are
situations where the odds of losing a pilot are simply too great.
Filming a volcanic eruption from close quarters, is an example
of something that the market is willing to pay for and that we
were not able to do before the UAS technology. However,
beyond the one-of-a-kind applications, it is the general ones
(section 1) that have the potential to develop future big markets.
In the next few years the most iikely scenario is that of three
parallel tasks; surviving on special projects, further developing
the technology and fighting the battle of integration in the
regulated airspace.
6. CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK
Like other professional communities, the PRS one has started
to use the UAS technology and has recognized its big potential.
In this paper we have discussed the technical and regulatory
issues related to UAS-based high-resolution and high-quality
PRS. On the technical side, a number of challenges have been
identified and the solutions adopted by the authors at the IG
have been outlined. Beyond the challenges, some advantages of
the UAS technology for PRS have been explored.
The main challenge, though, for UAS-based PRS to become a
mainstream technology is the clarification and the development
of the regulatory issues; particularly, of the integration of UAs
in the non-segregated civilian airspace. Indeed, this is not an
easy task. However, the international UAS marketplace is
growing fast and the aviation authorities and regulatory bodies
are aware of this. Not so many years ago, the
commercialization of medium- and high-resolution satellite
images extended the paradigm of image acquisition. And the
paradigm may continue to evolve...
REFERENCES
Blâzquez, M., 2008. A new approach to spatio-temporal
calibration of multi-sensor systems. In: International Archives
of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 37-B1,
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,
Beijing, China.
Colomina, L, 2007. From off-line to on-line geocoding: the
evolution of sensor orientation. In: Proceedings of the 51th
Photogrammetric Week, Stuttgart, Germany.
1205