The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B4. Beijing 2008
flight lines. The spots surveyed by GPS are showed with the
numbers with red color and little points. The area is about 10
square kilometers. The flight and footprints information are:
• flight height above ground: 800 meters;
• flight speed: 160 kilometers per hour;
• flight direction: from west to east and from east to west;
• the number of flight lines: 12;
• Pulse Repetition Frequency (PRF): lOOKHz;
• Scan angle: 20 degree;
• The overlap of two conjoint swath: 44%;
• The mean distance of footprints: 0.51 meters;
• Distance from GPS base station to study area: 130
kilometers.
3. WHAT DID WE DO AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Accuracy of elevation of LiDAR data
We processed the LiDAR data with TerraSolid Software:
TerraScan, TerraPhoto, and TerraModeler. The DEM and DSM
data can be done with TerraScan and TerraModeler, and DOM
need TerraScan and TerraPhoto. We also made
three-dimensional models with TerraScan, TerraPhoto. Making
DLG is more complicated, that need other soft and skills
besides TerraSolid Software.
The precision of DEM is the most important to LiDAR system.
We acquired points’ XYZ with GPS in the site before the flight,
then import to TerraScan soft. It can be got following result:
3Ì.13
.
31.2:3
31.16
Figure 3 Differences between 1:500 and 1:1000 DLG
The elements in 1:1000 scale DLG was draw in black, which
were made in TerraSolid software with LiDAR point clouds
and images. In comparison, 1:500 scale was done in field
survey with Total Stations drawing in red color. From black
circles in figure 3 we can see 1:1000 scale map is deviate to
east. But, the distance is less than 0.8 meters, and it is systemic.
In black rectangle of figure 3, elevation values are almost same
that proved elevation accuracy very good.
F: !£ELIDAR3&ffiiJ&S\JIANCE.txt
Number
Easting
Northing
Known Z
Laser Z
Dz
ldl
130404.695
141396.610
13.481
13.580
+0.099
Id 2
130583.982
141141.073
21.471
21.560
+0.089
ld3
129479.590
140676.407
25.338
25.330
-0.008
ld4
130206.297
140877.628
26.185
26.240
+0.055
ld6
130091.842
140493.284
20.818
20.900
+0.082
ld8
130742.662
140383.073
16.641
16.620
-0.021
ldlO
129907.651
140065.637
18.509
18.390
-0.119
ldl 2
129363.992
141286.615
32.422
32.490
+0.068
ldl3
129174.019
141103.580
32.138
32.130
-0.008
ldl 6
128673.826
140009.613
32.409
32.560
+0.151
ldl8
128668.458
141326.461
41.379
41.480
+0.101
ldl9
127558.540
141322.459
27.658
27.670
+0.012
ld22
127685.330
139354.422
36.031
36.090
+0.059
ld23
127586.736
138688.504
24.400
24.410
+0.010
ld25
130870.793
139836.037
12.122
12.180
+0.058
ld26
129426.492
139102.398
23.945
23.910
-0.035
ld28
127487.616
140337.378
66.046
55.890
-0.156
ld29
127879.356
140594.842
55.038
55.140
+0.102
ld31
128237.660
139726.818
41.783
41.400
-0.383
Average dz
+0.008
Minimum dz
-0.383
Maximum dz
+0.151
Average magnitude
0.085
Root mean square
0.119
Std deviation
0.122
Figure 2 Deviations of ground footprints to GPS points
There are 19 points we have got coordinate. We found that
average dz is 0.008 meter, root mean square is 0.119 meter, and
standard deviation is 0.122 meter. The accuracy of elevation is
every good.
3.2 Accuracy of DLG by LiDAR data
After processing point clouds of LiDAR data, we according
images obtained by camera of ALTM3100 system, drew one sq.
kilometer topographical map at 1:1000 scale in 4 sheets. The
maps from LiDAR system were contrasted with the map at
1:500 scales from field surveying. Following figure 3 showed
there are small offset between two kinds of maps, except for
some edges of small road line in front of houses.
3.3 Accuracy of DOM and three-dimensional models by
LiDAR
DOM can be done with the images of digital camera, such as
ADS40, DMC and UCX. It also can be done with the images of
camera installed along laser scanner in LiDAR system. We
have done 10 sq. km DOM in Nanjing and check its accuracy
with two types of methods, which are based GPS and DLG
survey. The following figure shows how to add 1:500 scale
DLG onto DOM.
Figure 4 contrast of DLG and DOM
The figure 4 showed DLG and DOM were matched well. There
is small deviation on two type of map. If we consider DLG
have high accuracy, the DOM have a systemic error according
showing of figure 4, which is 0.8 meter with west to east
direction.
1254