The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B7. Beijing 2008 
<r»f * t%. 
***.Î 
! ■ * <&&& 
sf H 
m* 
# f 
« 
**■ 
» m -1 A d * * 
w**#* \ 1M* 4 
<*•■<'’* ** 
5,1 11 m rffc 
vg&s Jp 
« 1«#** # 
* * 
^ » 
mm u 4 ^ 
«P-*. • 
Building Tree Land Grass 
Fig. 5. Classification results (left column) and detected 
buildings (right column) obtained by applying the 
algorithms in pixel level; Top row: results of 
maximum likelihood method; Middle row: results 
of minimum distance method; Bottom row: results 
of Dempster-Shafer method. 
Building Tree Land Grass 
Fig. 6. Classification results (left column) and detected 
buildings (right column) obtained by applying the 
algorithms in object level; Top row: results of 
maximum likelihood method; Middle row: results 
of minimum distance method; Bottom row: results 
of Dempster-Shafer method. 
Detection 
False 
False 
rate 
Positive 
Negative 
ML_pix 
0.87 
0.05 
0.13 
MD_pix 
0.68 
0.01 
0.32 
DS_pix 
0.75 
0.01 
0.25 
Table 4. Performance measures for detection in pixel level 
using the three methods. 
Detection 
False 
False 
rate 
Positive 
Negative 
MLobj 
0.95 
0.11 
0.05 
MDobj 
0.71 
0.02 
0.29 
DS_obj 
0.78 
0.02 
0.22 
Table 5. Performance measures for detection in object level 
using the three methods.