[chap. I
§ 14] COMPARISON OF THE TWO DEFINITIONS 23
aside from
r 6 S ri EC., if
r matrices.
;r F is self-
iterchanges
multiplication of n-tuples by formulas (20) and (21),
and scalar multiplication of a number of p of F and an
w-tuple by formula (22). To pass to the definition in
§ 4, employ the particular w-tuples
(23) «i=[l, 0, . . . . , 0], u 2 = {0, 1, 0, . . . . , 0], . . . . ,
livalent or
uivalent to
«« = [0, . . . . , 0, 1]
as basal units. By (20) «and (22), [&, =
ich element
i § 4, has a
in F with
. . . . , u n ,
ae w-tuple*
F. Using
te equations
£iMi+ .... -\-% n u n . Then (20), (21), (22) take the
form ( 1 Oj), (13), (14), and, as noted in § 9, all of the
assumptions made in § 4 are satisfied. Hence an algebra
of w-tuples is an algebra according to § 4 and conversely.
Hence there exists an algebra over F having as con
stants of multiplication any given n 3 numbers 7of F.
The algebra will be associative if the 7’s satisfy the con
ditions (§58) obtained from {uiUj)u k = Ui{ujU k ).
14. Comparison of the two definitions of an algebra.
Under the definition in § 4, an algebra over a field F is
. • , >
a system consisting of a set of wholly undefined elements
and three undefined operations which satisfy five postu
n
kiVj'Yijn )
i,j = i
lates.
Under Hamilton’s definition in § 13, an algebra of
order n over F is a system consisting of n 3 constants 7 t j k
of F, a set of partially* defined elements [£ r , . . . . , £ w ],
ini P in F -
and three defined operations, while no postulates are
imposed on the system other than that which partially
ng definition
r F: Choose
es [&, . . . . ,
addition and
determines the elements. This definition really implies
a definite set (23) of basal units. A transformation of
units leads to a new algebra (equivalent to the initial
algebra) with new values for the n 3 constants 7^.
;rs of each quad-
* Each element is an w-tuple of numbers of F. In particular, if F
is a finite field of order p, there are evidently exactly p n elements.