Retrodigitalisierung Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Technical Commission VII (B7)

Access restriction

There is no access restriction for this record.

Copyright

CC BY: Attribution 4.0 International. You can find more information here.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Technical Commission VII (B7)

Multivolume work

Persistent identifier:
1663813779
Title:
XXII ISPRS Congress 2012
Sub title:
Melbourne, Australia, 25 August-1 September 2012
Year of publication:
2013
Place of publication:
Red Hook, NY
Publisher of the original:
Curran Associates, Inc.
Identifier (digital):
1663813779
Language:
English
Additional Notes:
Kongress-Thema: Imaging a sustainable future
Corporations:
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Congress, 22., 2012, Melbourne
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Adapter:
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Congress, 22., 2012, Melbourne
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Founder of work:
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Congress, 22., 2012, Melbourne
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Other corporate:
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Congress, 22., 2012, Melbourne
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Document type:
Multivolume work

Volume

Persistent identifier:
1663821976
Title:
Technical Commission VII
Scope:
546 Seiten
Year of publication:
2013
Place of publication:
Red Hook, NY
Publisher of the original:
Curran Associates, Inc.
Identifier (digital):
1663821976
Illustration:
Illustrationen, Diagramme
Signature of the source:
ZS 312(39,B7)
Language:
English
Additional Notes:
Erscheinungsdatum des Originals ist ermittelt.
Literaturangaben
Usage licence:
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Corporations:
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Congress, 22., 2012, Melbourne
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Adapter:
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Congress, 22., 2012, Melbourne
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Founder of work:
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Congress, 22., 2012, Melbourne
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Other corporate:
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Congress, 22., 2012, Melbourne
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Publisher of the digital copy:
Technische Informationsbibliothek Hannover
Place of publication of the digital copy:
Hannover
Year of publication of the original:
2019
Document type:
Volume
Collection:
Earth sciences

Chapter

Title:
[VII/4: METHODS FOR LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION]
Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter

Chapter

Title:
LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION OF MULTI-SENSOR IMAGES BY DECISION FUSION USING WEIGHTS OF EVIDENCE MODEL Peijun Li and Bengin Song
Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter

Contents

Table of contents

  • XXII ISPRS Congress 2012
  • Technical Commission VII (B7)
  • Cover
  • Title page
  • TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Volume XXXIX, Part B7, Commission VII - elSSN 2194-9034
  • [VII/1: PHYSICAL MODELLING AND SIGNATURES IN REMOTE SENSING]
  • [VII/2: SAR INTERFEROMETRY]
  • [VII/3: INFORMATION EXTRACTION FROM HYPERSPECTRAL DATA]
  • [VII/4: METHODS FOR LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION]
  • LAND COVER INFORMATION EXTRACTION USING LIDAR DATA Ahmed Shaker, Nagwa El-Ashmawy
  • COMBINATION OF GENETIC ALGORITHM AND DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY OF EVIDENCE FOR LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION USING INTEGRATION OF SAR AND OPTICAL SATELLITE IMAGERY H. T. Chu and L. Ge
  • DEFINING DENSITIES FOR URBAN RESIDENTIAL TEXTURE, THROUGH LAND USE CLASSIFICATION, FROM LANDSAT TM IMAGERY: CASE STUDY OF SPANISH MEDITERRANEAN COAST N. Colaninno, J. Roca, M. Burns, B. Alhaddad
  • SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE CLASSIFICATION OF OBJECT-BASED DATA FOR CROP MAPPING, USING MULTI-TEMPORAL LANDSAT IMAGERY R. Devadas, R. J. Denham and M. Pringle
  • NEW COMBINED PIXEL/OBJECT-BASED TECHNIQUE FOR EFFICIENT URBAN CLASSSIFICATION USING WORLDVIEW-2 DATA Ahmed Elsharkawy, Mohamed Elhabiby & Naser El-Sheimy
  • OPTIMIZATION OF DECISION-MAKING FOR SPATIAL SAMPLING IN THE NORTH CHINA PLAIN, BASED ON REMOTE-SENSING A PRIORI KNOWLEDGE Jianzhong Feng, Linyan Bai, Shihong Liu, Xiaolu Su, Haiyan Hu
  • RANDOM FORESTS-BASED FEATURE SELECTION FOR LAND-USE CLASSIFICATION USING LIDAR DATA AND ORTHOIMAGERY Haiyan Guan, Jun Yu, Jonathan Li, Lun Luo
  • SPATIAL INTERPOLATION AS A TOOL FOR SPECTRAL UNMIXING OF REMOTELY SENSED IMAGES Li Xi, Chen Xiaoling
  • LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION OF MULTI-SENSOR IMAGES BY DECISION FUSION USING WEIGHTS OF EVIDENCE MODEL Peijun Li and Bengin Song
  • RESEARCH ON DIFFERENTIAL CODING METHOD FOR SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING DATA COMPRESSION Z. J. Lin, N. Yao, B. Deng, C. Z. Wang, J. H. Wang
  • ACCURACY EVALUATION OF TWO GLOBAL LAND COVER DATA SETS OVER WETLANDS OF CHINA Z. G. Niu, Y. X. Shan, P. Gong
  • IDENTIFICATION OF LAND COVER IN THE PAST USING INFRARED IMAGES AT PRESENT V. Safár, V. Zdímal
  • ALBEDO PATTERN RECOGNITION AND TIME-SERIES ANALYSES IN MALAYSIA S. A. Salleh, Z. Abd Latif, W. M. N. Wan Mohd, A. Chan
  • MODELING SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF A RARE AND ENDANGERED PLANT SPECIES (Brainea insignis) IN CENTRAL TAIWAN Wen-Chiao Wang, Nan-Jang Lo, Wei-I Chang, Kai-Yi Huang
  • POST-CLASSIFICATION APPROACH BASED ON GEOSTATISTICS TO REMOTE SENSING IMAGES : SPECTRAL AND SPATIAL INFORMATION FUSION N. Yao, J. X. Zhang, Z. J. Lin, C. F. Ren
  • CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIVE MICROWAVE AND PASSIVE OPTICAL DATA BASED ON BAYESIAN THEORY AND MRF F. Yu, H. T. Li, Y. S. Han, H. Y. Gu
  • [VII/5: METHODS FOR CHANGE DETECTION AND PROCESS MODELLING]
  • [VII/6: REMOTE SENSING DATA FUSION]
  • [VII/7: THEORY AND EXPERIMENTS IN RADAR AND LIDAR]
  • [VII/3, VII/6, III/2, V/3: INTEGRATION OF HYPERSPECTRAL AND LIDAR DATA]
  • [VII/7, III/2, V/1, V/3, ICWG V/I: LOW-COST UAVS (UVSS) AND MOBILE MAPPING SYSTEMS]
  • [VII/7, III/2, V/3: WAVEFORM LIDAR FOR REMOTE SENSING]
  • [ADDITIONAL PAPERS]
  • AUTHOR INDEX
  • Cover

Full text

From expressions (2) and (3), we can obtain: 
log, O(D | E, ) = log, O(D)+ Ww, 
log, O(D | E,) - log, O(D)- W; (4) 
Similarly, if more than two evidence maps are used, they can be 
added by assuming that all the evidence maps are also 
conditionally independent with respect to the occurrence of a 
class. Therefore, we can obtain, 
log, O(D | E! E: E!) - log, O(D)- Y W/ 
e ne 
where the superscript & refers to the presence or absence of the 
evidence, respectively. 
As mentioned previously, the WOE assumes that all the 
evidence patterns are conditionally independent. However, in 
most applications, = evidence patterns are conditionally 
dependent. Thus, posterior probability estimates by directly 
using WOE are likely to be biased upwards when this 
assumption is violated. In this study, we adopted a modified 
WOE model, which is called the conditional dependence 
adjusted weights of evidence (CDAWE) (Deng, 2009), to 
correct the bias using the correlation structure of the evidence 
patterns. 
2.2 Fusion of multi-sensor data for land cover classification 
In this study, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) was first 
applied on different data to produce land cover classification 
results. The SVM classifier is a recently developed statistical 
learning method, which has been widely used in remote sensing 
image classification and showed very good performance (e.g., 
Gualtieri and Cromp, 1998; Huang et al., 2002; Melgani and 
Bruzzone, 2004). The obtained urban classification results were 
then fused by weights of evidence model. The estimation of 
conditional probability for each class is crucially important, 
since it directly related to the weight of each evidential map. In 
this study, the intermediate classification results derived from the 
SVM classification, i.e. posterior probability of classification, 
either from classification rule image as in ENVI or using the 
method proposed by Platt (2000) were used as the initial 
conditional probability of each class. Since classification results 
from different data show different accuracies (i.e. class 
reliability), final conditional probability for each class is 
obtained by combining conditional probability from the initial 
classification and class reliability (i.e. class accuracy). Since the 
conventional weights of evidence method is defined for one- 
class extraction (e.g. mineral occurrence), in order to extend it to 
multi-class classification, the weights of evidence method was 
first used in classification to produce a posterior probability for 
each class, and then the class for each pixel is estimated by 
taking the most probable class of the posterior distribution (i.e. 
with highest posterior probability). 
3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 
The proposed method was evaluated and validated in land cover 
classification using two examples. The first example includes 
Landsat TM and multitemporal ENVISAT ASAR data, 
covering Beijing urban-suburban area, China. The second 
example includes Landsat ETM+ and SPOT 5 multispectral 
images of Hengshui area of Hebei Province, China. Landsat 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B7, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
   
TM/ETM+ and ENVISAT ASAR data have a 30m spatial 
resolution, whereas the SPOT 5 data have a 10 m spatial 
resolution (band 4 has 20 m spatial resolution). 
Results showed that the combination of multi-sensor data using 
weights of evidence model produced higher classification 
accuracy than the use of single data alone. For example, for 
Beijing area, combined classification based on WOE produced 
41.72% and 3.22% of increase in Kappa coefficient, compared 
with those from SAR and TM images, respectively (Table 1). 
For Hengshui area, combined classification based on WOE 
produced 7.08% and 6.22% of increase in Kappa coefficient, 
compared with those from ETM+ and SPOT 5 images, 
respectively (Table 2). It seems that when two individual 
classification results show comparable accuracy, the increase in 
classification accuracy (both overall accuracy and Kappa 
coefficient) produced by WOE based decision fusion is more 
significant (i.e. in Table 2). 
Figures 1 and 2 show portions of classifications using 
difference data combinations for two examples. From these 
figures, WOE effectively fused the classification results from 
different results. For example, salt-pepper appearance was 
significantly reduced. 
4. CONCLUSION 
A decision fusion method based on the weights of evidence 
model was proposed in this study and evaluated in land cover 
classification using two different es. Results showed that the 
combination of different data using weights of evidence model 
in land cover classification produced significantly higher 
accuracy (both overall accuracy and Kappa) than the use of 
single source of data alone. 
In conclusion, the weights of evidence model provides an 
effective decision fusion method for improved land cover 
classification using multi-sensor data. 
5. REFERENCES 
Bonham-Carter, G. F., Agterberg, F. P., and Wright, D. F., 1988. 
Integration of geological datasets for gold exploration in Nova 
Scotia. Photogram. Remote Sens., v. 54, no. 11, p. 1585-1592. 
Bonham-Carter, G. F., Agterberg, F. P., and Wright, D. F., 1989. 
Weights of evidence modelling: a new approach to mapping 
mineral potential, in Agterberg, F. P., and Bonham-Carter, G. F., 
eds., Statistical Applications in the Earth Sciences: Geological 
Survey Canada paper 9-9, p. 171—183. 
Deng, M., 2009. A Conditional Dependence Adjusted Weights 
of Evidence Model. Natural Resources Research, 18(4), 249- 
258. 
Good, I. J., 1985. Statistical evidence. In Encyclopedia of 
statistical Sciences, New York, Wiley, pp., 651-656. 
Gualtieri, J.A., and R.F. Cromp, 1998. Support vector machines 
for hyperspectral remote sensing classification, Proceedings of 
SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering, 3584: 
221-232. 
Huang, C., L.S. Davis, and J.R.G. Townshend, 2002. An 
assessment of support vector machines for land cover 
classification, /nternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 
23(4):725—749. 
   
  
  
  
    
   
   
   
   
    
   
   
   
    
     
  
  
   
   
    
   
   
   
    
  
  
    
    
   
   
  
  
   
    
  
   
   
    
    
  
    
  
   
   
   
  
 
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

To quote this image the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Technical Commission VII. Curran Associates, Inc., 2013.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fourth digit in the number series 987654321?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.