Retrodigitalisierung Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Access restriction

There is no access restriction for this record.

Copyright

CC BY: Attribution 4.0 International. You can find more information here.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Monograph

Persistent identifier:
856473650
Author:
Baltsavias, Emmanuel P.
Title:
Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
Sub title:
Joint ISPRS/EARSeL Workshop ; 3 - 4 June 1999, Valladolid, Spain
Scope:
III, 209 Seiten
Year of publication:
1999
Place of publication:
Coventry
Publisher of the original:
RICS Books
Identifier (digital):
856473650
Illustration:
Illustrationen, Diagramme, Karten
Language:
English
Usage licence:
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Publisher of the digital copy:
Technische Informationsbibliothek Hannover
Place of publication of the digital copy:
Hannover
Year of publication of the original:
2016
Document type:
Monograph
Collection:
Earth sciences

Chapter

Title:
TECHNICAL SESSION 4 FUSION OF SENSOR-DERIVED PRODUCTS
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Chapter

Title:
STRATEGIES AND METHODS FOR THE FUSION OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS FROM OPTICAL AND SAR DATA. M. Honikel
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Contents

Table of contents

  • Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
  • Cover
  • ColorChart
  • Title page
  • CONTENTS
  • PREFACE
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 1 OVERVIEW OF IMAGE / DATA / INFORMATION FUSION AND INTEGRATION
  • DEFINITIONS AND TERMS OF REFERENCE IN DATA FUSION. L. Wald
  • TOOLS AND METHODS FOR FUSION OF IMAGES OF DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTION. C. Pohl
  • INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS. Emmanuel Baltsavias, Michael Hahn,
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 2 PREREQUISITES FOR FUSION / INTEGRATION: IMAGE TO IMAGE / MAP REGISTRATION
  • GEOCODING AND COREGISTRATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Hannes Raggam, Mathias Schardt and Heinz Gallaun
  • GEORIS : A TOOL TO OVERLAY PRECISELY DIGITAL IMAGERY. Ph.Garnesson, D.Bruckert
  • AUTOMATED PROCEDURES FOR MULTISENSOR REGISTRATION AND ORTHORECTIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. Ian Dowman and Paul Dare
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 3 OBJECT AND IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • LANDCOVER MAPPING BY INTERRELATED SEGMENTATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. W. Schneider, J. Steinwendner
  • INCLUSION OF MULTISPECTRAL DATA INTO OBJECT RECOGNITION. Bea Csathó , Toni Schenk, Dong-Cheon Lee and Sagi Filin
  • SCALE CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCAL AUTOCOVARIANCES FOR TEXTURE SEGMENTATION. Annett Faber, Wolfgang Förstner
  • BAYESIAN METHODS: APPLICATIONS IN INFORMATION AGGREGATION AND IMAGE DATA MINING. Mihai Datcu and Klaus Seidel
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 4 FUSION OF SENSOR-DERIVED PRODUCTS
  • AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF URBAN ENVIRONMENTS FOR DATABASE REVISION USING LIDAR AND COLOR AERIAL IMAGERY. N. Haala, V. Walter
  • STRATEGIES AND METHODS FOR THE FUSION OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS FROM OPTICAL AND SAR DATA. M. Honikel
  • INTEGRATION OF DTMS USING WAVELETS. M. Hahn, F. Samadzadegan
  • ANISOTROPY INFORMATION FROM MOMS-02/PRIRODA STEREO DATASETS - AN ADDITIONAL PHYSICAL PARAMETER FOR LAND SURFACE CHARACTERISATION. Th. Schneider, I. Manakos, Peter Reinartz, R. Müller
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 5 FUSION OF VARIABLE SPATIAL / SPECTRAL RESOLUTION IMAGES
  • ADAPTIVE FUSION OF MULTISOURCE RASTER DATA APPLYING FILTER TECHNIQUES. K. Steinnocher
  • FUSION OF 18 m MOMS-2P AND 30 m LANDS AT TM MULTISPECTRAL DATA BY THE GENERALIZED LAPLACIAN PYRAMID. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • OPERATIONAL APPLICATIONS OF MULTI-SENSOR IMAGE FUSION. C. Pohl, H. Touron
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 6 INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS
  • KNOWLEDGE BASED INTERPRETATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Stefan Growe
  • AUTOMATIC RECONSTRUCTION OF ROOFS FROM MAPS AND ELEVATION DATA. U. Stilla, K. Jurkiewicz
  • INVESTIGATION OF SYNERGY EFFECTS BETWEEN SATELLITE IMAGERY AND DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC DATABASES BY USING INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING. Dietmar Kunz
  • INTERACTIVE SESSION 1 IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • AN AUTOMATED APPROACH FOR TRAINING DATA SELECTION WITHIN AN INTEGRATED GIS AND REMOTE SENSING ENVIRONMENT FOR MONITORING TEMPORAL CHANGES. Ulrich Rhein
  • CLASSIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT STRUCTURES USING MORPHOLOGICAL AND SPECTRAL FEATURES IN FUSED HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES (IRS-1C). Maik Netzband, Gotthard Meinel, Regin Lippold
  • ASSESSMENT OF NOISE VARIANCE AND INFORMATION CONTENT OF MULTI-/HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGERY. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Alessandro Barducci, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • COMBINING SPECTRAL AND TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. H. He , C. Collet
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 7 APPLICATIONS IN FORESTRY
  • SENSOR FUSED IMAGES FOR VISUAL INTERPRETATION OF FOREST STAND BORDERS. R. Fritz, I. Freeh, B. Koch, Chr. Ueffing
  • A LOCAL CORRELATION APPROACH FOR THE FUSION OF REMOTE SENSING DATA WITH DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS IN FORESTRY APPLICATIONS. J. Hill, C. Diemer, O. Stöver, Th. Udelhoven
  • OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATION AND APPLICATIONS IN THE ALPINE FOREST ENVIRONMENT. R. de Kok, T. Schneider, U. Ammer
  • Author Index
  • Keyword Index
  • Cover

Full text

999 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 7-4-3 W6, Valladolid, Spain, 3-4 June, 1999 
83 
STRATEGIES AND METHODS FOR THE FUSION OF DIGITAL 
ELEVATION MODELS FROM OPTICAL AND SAR DATA 
M. Honikel 
Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry, ETH Zürich-Hönggerberg, CH-8093 Zürich, marc.honikel@geod.ethz.ch 
KEYWORDS: DEM, ERS, SPOT, Data fusion. 
ABSTRACT 
Generation of digital elevation models (DEMs) is a main issue of remote sensing, as precise DEMs are needed in a wide range of 
remote sensing applications. The most widespread techniques for DEM generation are stereoscopy for optical sensor images and 
interferometry for SAR images. Both techniques suffer from certain sensor and processing limitations, which can be overcome by the 
synergetic use of both sensors and DEMs respectively. In this paper, different strategies for fusing SAR and optical data are 
combined to derive high quality DEM products. Quality in this context means accuracy of heights. An estimation of the error 
properties of both datasets is derived both from the data processing and the single DEMs themselves. The stereo-optical and In SAR 
techniques have distinct, partially complementary, error properties. Two techniques, which take advantage of the complementary 
properties of InSAR and stereo-optical DEMs, will be applied for the fusion process. First, as cross-correlation plays a major role for 
the height measurement in both techniques, the cross-correlation of phases, respectively grey values, are determined for each DEM 
point and used as weight for the DEM fusion. In the second technique to be applied, by taking advantage of the fact that errors of the 
DEMs are of different nature, affected parts are filtered and replaced by those of the counterpart. The results of both techniques will 
be fused in a final step. This procedure is tested with two sets of SPOT and ERS DEMs of regions in south-central Catalonia, 
resulting in a remarkable improvement in DEM accuracy and representation of the terrain. 
1. INTRODUCTION 
The two main techniques for DEM generation from satellite 
imagery are stereoscopy with optical sensors and interferometry 
with SAR sensors. The height is measured in different ways in 
both techniques. InSAR computes the height from the phase 
difference of the point backscatter in two passes. Since phases 
in an interferogram are wrapped in an 2n interval, the critical 
step in the generation of elevation models with SAR 
interferometry is phase unwrapping, i.e. the solution of these 
phase ambiguities. Phase unwrapping becomes extremely 
difficult in cases of low signal to noise ratio due to 
decorrelation of the phase measurements. In the optical case, the 
coordinate difference of conjugate points in both images must 
be measured for the height determination. Therefore, the correct 
identification (matching) of conjugate points is essential for 
accurate stereo height measurements. Again, decorrelation 
handicaps the matching or even leads to point mismatching. 
As both techniques are based on different principles and 
sensors, the question arises, how these independent height 
measurements can be fused to obtain DEMs, which do not 
suffer from the single sensor limitations and consist only of 
valid measurements of each single source. Obviously, this task 
goes beyond the straightforward (yet not simple) identification 
and exchange of data in regions, where the height measurement 
of one of the contributing sensors fails (e.g. occlusions, 
layover), as it would not take advantage of the independent 
measurements as a whole. An estimation of the height errors is 
needed for any fusion process, in order to profit from both 
sensors. Provided a measure is found, which is directly related 
to the height error, it can be used to define a weight according 
to which the DEMs can be fused. As correlation is a critical 
factor for both techniques, the correlation coefficient of both 
measurements will be introduced as weight for the proposed 
fusion method. Although the correlation coefficient has 
different meaning in both techniques, it still relates to the 
measurement error. 
2. INSAR AND STEREO-OPTICAL DEM ERRORS 
Like all measurements, the measurement of topographic heights 
is error corrupted for various reasons. According to the error 
model introduced by Baarda (1967), three general types of 
errors have to be distinguished: 
• systematic errors, which occur in all measurements due to 
measurement inconsistencies. 
• random errors, which are inevitable and nonpredictable. 
They can be described as random variables. 
• blunders, which are large and occur due to an erroneous 
handling of the measurement process. 
This error model, originally designed for geodetic networks, 
applies to redundant measurements of the same parameter. As 
we deal here with single measurements with different sensors, 
the model must be modified, as an assumption of redundancy 
would be invalid in this case. 
The systematic error in this context applies to a global error, 
which affects all measurements within a DEM (e.g. baseline
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

To quote this image the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

baltsavias, emmanuel p. Fusion of Sensor Data, Knowledge Sources and Algorithms for Extraction and Classification of Topographic Objects. RICS Books, 1999.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.