174 THE ELEMENTS DOWN TO PLATO’S TIME
Vitruvius tells us that one Agatharchus was the first to paint
stage-scenes at Athens, at the time when Aeschylus was
having his tragedies performed, and that he left a treatise on
the subject which was afterwards a guide to Democritus and
Anaxagoras, who discussed The same problem, namely that of
painting objects on a plane surface in such a way as to make
some of the Things depicted appear to be in the background
while others appeared to stand out in the foreground, so that
you seemed, e.g., to have real buildings before you; in other
words, Anaxagoras and Democritus both wrote treatises on
perspective. 1
There is not much to be gathered from the passage in
the Rivals to which Proclus refers. Socrates, on entering the
school of Dionysius, finds two lads disputing a certain point,
something about Anaxagoras or Oenopides, he was not certain
which; but they appeared to be drawing circles, and to be
imitating certain inclinations by placing their hands at an
angle. 2 Now this description suggests that what the lads
were trying to represent was the circles of the equator and
the zodiac or ecliptic; and we know that in fact Eudemus
in his History of Astronomy attributed to Oenopides the dis
covery of ‘ the cincture of the zodiac circle ’, 3 which must mean
the discovery of the obliquity of the ecliptic. It would prob
ably be unsafe to conclude that Anaxagoras was also credited
with the same discovery, but it certainly seems to be suggested
that Anaxagoras had to some extent touched the mathematics
of astronomy.
Oenopides op Chios was primarily an astronomer. This
is shown not only by the reference of Eudemus just cited, but
by a remark of Proclus in connexion with one of two proposi
tions in elementary geometry attributed to him. 4 Eudemus
is quoted as saying that he not only discovered the obliquity
of the ecliptic, but also the period of a Great Year. Accord
ing to Diodorus the Egyptian priests claimed that it was from
them that Oenopides learned that the sun moves in an inclined
orbit and in a sense opposite to the motion of the fixed stars.
It does not appear that Oenopides made any measurement of
1 Vitruvius, De architectura, vii. praef. 11.
2 Plato, Erastae 132 A, B. 3 Theon of Smyrna, p. 198. 14.
4 Proclus on Eucl. I, p. 288, 7-8.