188 THE ELEMENTS DOWN TO PLATO’S TIME
edition of the whole extract. Whereas Diels, Usener, Tannery,
and Heiberg had all seen in the sentences ‘ For, as the circles
are to one another . . . less than semicircles ’ an addition by
Simplicius, like the phrase just preceding (not quoted above),
‘ a proposition which Euclid placed second in his twelfth book
with the enunciation “ Circles are to one another as the squares
on their diameters’”, Rudio maintains that the sentences are
wholly Eudemian, because ‘ For, as the circles are to one
another, so are the similar segments’ is obviously connected
with the proposition that similar segments are as the squares
on their bases a few lines back. Assuming, then, that the
sentences are Eudemian, Rudio bases his next argument on
the sentence defining similar segments, ‘ For similar segments
are those which are the same part of the circles: thus a semi
circle is similar to a semicircle, and a third part (of one circle)
to a third part (of another circle) He argues that a ‘ segment ’
in the proper sense which is one third, one fourth, *&c., of the
circle is not a conception likely to have been introduced into
Hippocrates’s discussion, because it cannot be visualized by
actual construction, and so would not have conveyed any clear
idea. On the other hand, if we divide the four right angles
about the centre of a circle into 3, 4, or n equal parts by
means of 3, 4, or n radii, we have an obvious division of the
circle into equal parts which would occur to any one; that is,
any one would understand the expression one third or one
fourth part of a circle if the parts were sectors and not
segments. (The use of the word r/xriixa in the sense of sector
is not impossible in itself at a date when mathematical
terminology was not finally fixed; indeed it means ‘ sector ’
in one passage of Aristotle. 1 ) Hence Rudio will have it that
‘similar segments’ in the second and third places in our passage
are ‘ similar sectors But the ‘ similar segments ’ in the funda
mental proposition of Hippocrates enunciated just before are
certainly segments in the proper sense; so are those in the
next sentence which says that similar segments contain equal
angles. There is, therefore, the very great difficulty that,
under Rudio’s interpretation, the word T/jLrjfxara used in
successive sentences means, first segments, then sectors, and
then segments again. However, assuming this to be so, Rudio
1 Arist. De caelo, ii. 8, 290 a 4.