232
THE SQUARING OF THE CIRCLE
by Nicomedes, some have supposed the ‘sister of the eochloid ’
(or conchoid) to be the quadratrix, but this seems highly im
probable. There is, however, another possibility. Apollonius
is known to have written a regular treatise on the Gochlias,
which was the cylindrical helix. 1 It is conceivable that he
might call the cochlias the ‘ sister of the eochloid ’ on the
ground of the similarity of the names, if not of the curves.
And, as a matter of fact, the drawing of a tangent to the
helix enables the circular section of the cylinder to be squared.
For, if a plane be drawn at right angles to the axis of the
cylinder through the initial position of the moving radius
which describes the helix, and if we project on this plane
the portion of the tangent at any point of the helix intercepted
between the point and the plane, the projection is equal to
an arc of the circular section of the cylinder subtended by an
angle at the centre equal to the angle through which the
plane through the axis and the moving radius has turned
from its original position. And this squaring by means of
what we may call the ‘ subtangent ’ is sufficiently parallel to
the use by Archimedes of the polar subtangent to the spiral
for the same purpose to make the hypothesis attractive.
Nothing whatever is known of Carpus’s curve ‘ of double
motion ’. Tannery thought it was the cycloid; but there is no
evidence for this.
(8) Approximations to the value of n.
As we have seen, Archimedes, by inscribing and cir
cumscribing regular polygons of 96 sides, and calculating
their perimeters respectively, obtained the approximation
3y > 7t > 3yy (Measurement of a Circle, Prop. 3). But we
now learn 2 that, in a work on Plinthides and Cylinders, he
made a nearer approximation still. Unfortunately the figures
as they stand in the Greek text áre incorrect, the lower limit
being given as the ratio of /qacooe to y^vya, or 211875:67441
i0
{■= 3-141635), and the higher limit as the ratio of y fairy to
yfirva or 197888 : 62351 {— 3-17377), so that the lower limit
1 Pappus, viii, p. 1110. 20; Proclus on Eucl. I, p. 105. 5.
2 Heron, Metrica, i. 26, p. 66. 13-17.