DATE AND TRADITIONS
355
More particulars are, it is true, furnished by Arabian
authors. We are told that
‘ Euclid, son of Naucrates, and grandson of Zenarchus [the
Fihrist has ‘ son of Naucrates, the son of Berenice (?) ’], called
the author of geometry, a philosopher of somewhat ancient
date, a Greek by nationality, domiciled at Damascus, born at
Tyre, most learned in the science of geometry, published
a most excellent and most useful work entitled the foundation
or elements of geometry, a subject in which no more general
treatise existed before among the Greeks : nay, there was no
one even of later date who did not walk in his footsteps and
frankly profess his doctrine. Hence also Greek, Roman,
and Arabian geometers not a few, who undertook the task of
illustrating this work, published commentaries,. scholia, and
notes upon it, and made an abridgement of the work itself.
For this reason the Greek philosophers used to post up on the
doors of their schools the well-known notice, “Let no one
come to our school, who has not first learnt the elements
of Euclid 1
This shows the usual tendency of the Arabs to romance.
They were in the habit of recording the names of grand
fathers, w T hile the Greeks were not ; Damascus and Tyre were
no doubt brought in to gratify the desire which the Arabians
always showed to connect famous Greeks in some way or other
with the east (thus they described Pythagoras as a pupil of the
wise Salomo, and Hipparchus as ‘ the Chaldaean ’). We recog
nize the inscription over the doors of the schools of the Greek
philosophers as a variation of Plato’s yrjSeh dyeoyiirp-qro^
eio-LTco] the philosopher has become Greek philosophers in
general, the school their schools, while geometry has become
the Elements of Euclid. The Arabs even explained that the
name of Euclid, which they pronounced variously as Uclides or
deludes, was compounded of Ucli, a key, and Bis, a measure, or,
as some say, geometry, so that Uclides is equivalent to the
key of geometry !
In the Middle Ages most translators and editors spoke of
Euclid as Euclid of Megara, confusing our Euclid with Euclid
the philosopher, and the contemporary of Plato, who lived about
400 b. c. The first trace of the confusion appears in Valerius
1 Casiri, Bibliotheca Arabico-Hispana Escurialensis, i, p. 889 (Casiri’s
source is the Ta'rtkh al-Hukamd of al-Qiftï (d. 1248).
A a 2