Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 1)

502 
ON THE DEVELOPABLE DERIVED FROM 
[86 
To effect the reduction of this expression, consider in the first place the equations 
which determine the stationary points of the edge of regression. Writing instead of 
| : 7] the single letter t, these equations are 
at 2 + 2 bt + c = 0, 
bt 2 + 2 ct + d = 0, 
ct 2 + 2 dt + e = 0, 
dt 2 + 2 et +f = 0, 
write for shortness 
A = 2 (bf— 4ce + 3d 2 ), 
B = af— 3 be + 2cd, 
C — 2 (ae — 4bd + 3c 2 ), 
and let a, 3/3, 37, 8 represent the terms of 
a, 
b, 
c, 
d 
b, 
c, 
d, 
e 
c, 
d, 
e, 
f 
viz. a = bdf — be 2 + 2 cde — c 2 f — d s , 
'3/3 — adf— ae 2 — bcf + bde + c 2 e — cd 
37 = acf — ade — b 2 f + bd 2 + bee — c 2 d, 
8 = ace — ad 2 - b 2 e + 2 bed — c 3 ; 
it is obvious at first sight that the result of the elimination of t from the four 
quadratic equations is the system (equivalent of course to three equations), 
a= 0, /3=0, 7 = 0, 8 = 0. 
The system in question may however be represented under the more simple form 
(which shows at once that the number of stationary points is, as it ought to be, eight), 
A=0, B = 0, (7=0; 
this appears from the identical equations, 
(2c£ + 3d) (bt 2 + 2ci + d) 
— (2 bt + 4c) (ct 2 + 2 dt + e ) 
+ b (dt 2 + 2et +/) = \A ; 
(2ci + 3d) (at 2 + 2bt + c) 
— c (bt 2 + 2c£ + d) 
— (2at + 38) (ct 2 + 2di + e) 
+ a (dt 2 + 2e£ +/) = i?;
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.