Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 2)

117] 
93 
117. 
NOTE ON THE INTEGRAL \dx + J(m — x) (x + a) (# +fr) (a? + c). 
[From the Philosophical Magazine, vol. vi. (1853), pp. 103—105.] 
If in the formulae of my “ Note on the Porism of the in-and-circumscribed Polygon,” 
[115], it is assumed that 
1 
U = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 q— (ax 1 + by' 1 + cz 2 ) 
V = ax 2 + by 1 + cz 1 , 
and if a new parameter &> connected with the parameter w by the equation 
(om 
w — 
m — &) 
be made use of instead of w, then 
w U + V = ——— (x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ) + ax 2 + by- + cz 2 }; 
and thus the equation wU + V = 0, viz. the equation 
o> (x 2 + y‘ 2 + z 2 ) + ax 2 + by 2 + cz 2 = 0, 
is precisely of the same form as that considered in my Note on the Geometrical 
Representation of the Integral jdx+ V(« + a) (* + &)(* + c),’’ [113.] Moreover, introducing 
instead of £ a quantity y, such that 
1 = 
_ 
my 
m — y’ 
dmdy 
v/q! d(m-y)(a + y)(b + y)(c + y) 
then
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.