Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 3)

120 
[186 
186. 
ON THE DETERMINATION OF THE VALUE OF A CERTAIN 
DETERMINANT. 
[From the Quarterly Mathematical Journal, vol. n. (1858), pp. 163—166.] 
Consideeing the determinant 
0,1, 
n, 9, 2 
. n-1, e, 3 
n - 2, 9, 4 
let the successive diagonal minors be U 0y U 1 , U 2 ,...U X it is easy to find 
U 0 = l, 
Vi = 6, 
U 2 = (0*-l)-(n-l), 
U 3 = 6 {6* - 4) - 3 (n - 2) 0, 
u4 = (0 2 - 1) (0 2 -9) - 6 (re - 3) (0 a - 1) + 3 (n - 3) (n - 1), 
which in fact suggests the law, viz. 
U x = (9+ x — 1){9 + x — 3) {9 + x — o)...(9 — x + 5)(9 — x + 3)(9 — x + 1) 
— - ^2 ( n ~ x +1)(0 + x — 3){9 + x — 5)...(0 — x + 5)(0 — x + 3) 
x(x — l)6r — 2) (x — 3) . , w .. 
+ — ^“4 (w — x + 1) (n — x + 3) {0 + x — 5).. .{0 — x + 5) 
— &c. 
, , Se x(x — l)...(x — 2s+1). nw , 
+ (—) s —- 24~2s ~ {n-x+l)(n — x + 3)...(n — x-\-2s — l) 
(9 + x — 2s — 1)(# + x — 2s — 3)...(0 — x + 2s + 1) 
to s — ^x or %(x—l), as x is even or odd.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.