Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 3)

254 
[206 
206. 
NOTE ON A THEOREM RELATING TO THE RECTANGULAR 
HYPERBOLA. 
[From the Philosophical Magazine, vol. xiii. (1857), p. 423.] 
The following theorem is given in a slightly different form by Brianchon and 
Poncelet, Gergonne, vol. xi. [1820], p. 205, viz. Any conic whatever which passes through 
the three angles of a triangle and the point of intersection of the perpendiculars let 
fall from the angles of the triangle upon the opposite sides is a rectangular hyperbola; 
and there is an elegant demonstration depending on the properties of the inscribed 
hexagon. The theorem is, however, a particular case of the following: viz. “Any conic 
whatever which passes through the four points of intersection of two rectangular 
hyperbolas is a rectangular hyperbola.” And this, again, is a particular case of the 
following: viz. If there be a conic 12 and a line P, then considering any two conics 
U, V such that the points of intersection of P, U are harmonics in respect to the 
points of intersection of P, 12, and the points of P, V are also harmonics in respect 
to the points of intersection of P, i2, then any conic whatever W which passes through 
the four points of intersection of U, V will have the like property, viz. the points 
of intersection of P, W will be harmonics in respect of the points of intersection of 
P, 12; a theorem which is an immediate consequence of the theorem that three conics 
which intersect in the same four points are intersected by any line whatever in six 
points which are in involution. 
2, Stone Buildings, W.C., April 23, 1857.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.