Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 5)

[330 
330] 
ON DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS AND UMBILICI. 
121 
but to simplify 
= 0 ; this comes 
Disects the angle 
is 
[ now h in the 
ourhood of the 
ve through the 
lipsoid or other 
mrvature in the 
! umbilicus, the 
e of curvature. 
= 0; the value 
ler two values 
;he envelope of 
ejections of the 
bourhood of an 
and it was only because this equation did not appear to be readily integrable, that I 
considered, instead of it, the particular form 
y (p 2 — 1) + 2mxp = 0. 
But the general equation can be integrated; and the result presents itself in a 
simple form. For, returning to the differential equation 
and assuming 
or 
we have 
and we may write 
Assuming also 
(bx + cy) (p 2 - 1) + 2 (fx + gy)p = 0, 
bx + cy _ — 2v 
fx+gy~ v 2 -\’ 
(bx + cy) (v 2 — 1) + 2 (fx + gy) v = 0, 
1 = -, or (p — v) (vp + 1) = 0, 
v — 1 V 
p — v = 0. 
V 
y = ux, or 11 — —, 
* ' X 
the relation between u and v is 
or, as this may be written, 
b + cu _ — 2v 
f+gu~ v 2 -l’ 
^_1 + 2¿±Í!% = 0, 
b + CU 
giving 
v = ~ (/+ gu) - V(6 + cu)- + (/+ guf 
b + cu 
where for convenience the radical has been taken with a negative sign. We have more 
over 
j. b (v 2 - 1) + 2/v 
c (v 2 — 1) + 2gv' 
The equation p — v = 0, substituting for y its value ux, then becomes 
du 
x + u — v = 0 ; 
ax 
or, as this may be written, 
dx du 
1__— 
x u — v 
= 0; 
C. V. 
16
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.